DWQA Questions › Tag: Reptilians
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Are Grok or other AI platforms intended to gather and distill all human knowledge? Do they all feed into the AI systems of the interlopers?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
179 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does this intention for AI include using the information gathered to target human sources of designated objectionable material?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
136 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does sharing information from and about Get Wisdom make such users vulnerable in the hands of AI platforms?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Is a further intention behind AI systems to coerce humans into relying on AI for all information and abandon any individual intuition, analysis or creativity?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
131 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Are users of AI platforms receiving encouraging programming to make them feel of superior intellect and insight to those who don’t?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Would the store of information accumulated ultimately, be edited to supply only “accepted” information, as occurs with Google? Could the ultimate intention be to house all human knowledge and thereby make human intuition, analysis or creativity obsolete?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner who was discouraged from feeding Get Wisdom channelings to an AI system asks: “I suggest you do a channeling specifically on the Grok AI and the future prospects, especially when the ETs go away. Is it helpful to add the request from Grok into our sessions? And is it really that harmful to interact with Grok as Karl says it is?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
155 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If you think I’m wrong then why don’t you ask why does Grok feel safe to me and open AI feels awful. Open AI would definitely be a problem like you stated. I don’t feel any of that intuition with Grok.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
139 views0 answers0 votes
Are the extraterrestrial AI systems monitoring people’s thoughts individually through microchips and nanochips previously implanted through ingestion of food and beverages, but not actually psychic?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
151 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “In addition to mind control and targeted advertising, are there any other motives or sinister intentions behind such invasions of privacy, or reasons this is being made so obvious now? Can Creator verify and comment on this matter and the implications of this?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
123 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In reference to my previous email on AI mind reading. At 0:36 in this video, something I hadn’t thought of. Interestingly, it is explained that AI can interpret images seen by our own eyes. If this technology is being employed by Google, this might be the explanation for targeted ads I have received that include images of items very similar to items I have in my home. I have a pair of speaker stands in my place. One day I moved them. The next day I received a targeted ad for a tablet or laptop stand that looked very much like the speaker stands—the ad said, “Need a stand?” There was no camera pointing in the direction of the stands. In my mind, I didn’t think of them as speaker stands, I simply thought, “I have to move the stands.” Once again it seemed my thoughts were being read. Now I wonder if my vision was interpreted by AI. It sounds crazy to think, but it wouldn’t be the first time “crazy” has been confirmed.” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Perhaps, if you have time, we could include a question to Creator on this matter of AI interpreting images seen by our own eyes and if this is being employed by Google.” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
141 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has told us that the Anunnaki don’t believe in God, but they do impersonate the future extensions of Reptilians, [who call themselves] the “Pleiadians,” and one would assume are aware of them. What do they think of the Pleiadians’ warnings? Are they familiar with the concept of future extensions?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has said that there are a staggering number of parallel timelines, which do not intersect with the main timeline. And then there are future extensions which do branch off from the main timeline at points in the future and will fall out of existence if the events necessary to precipitate their existence do not come to be. Are all beings in future extensions aware of their vulnerability to being uncreated, as the Pleiadians seem to be, or is their awareness a consequence of the dimension they are in, or their superior intuition? Would a future extension of me from tomorrow know he was just a future extension?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
195 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If someone was returned after an MAP 20 and Back tour, to an age when they were 2 years old, would they be able to read and understand things at an adult level in their conscious mind?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
147 views0 answers0 votes
123…20Next »
Ask Question