DWQA Questions › Tag: Secret Space ProgramFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “We’ve been told by you in the past that the ETs may introduce another Covid-type pandemic event, but worse this time. Is the new Hantavirus that they’re introducing something that’s been tweaked to be more deadly and likely to cause another major pandemic?”ClosedNicola asked 19 hours ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers21 views0 answers0 votesIs David Wilcock safely in the light?ClosedNicola asked 21 hours ago • Human Lost Soul Spirits17 views0 answers0 votesA news report states: “Matthew James Sullivan, 39, died at his home in Falls Church, Virginia, on May 12, 2024. The Northern District Office of the Chief Medical Examiner determined the cause of death to be accidental drug intoxication involving alcohol, alprazolam, cyclobenzaprine, and imipramine. Sullivan, a Bronze Star recipient who served during Operation Enduring Freedom, had previously worked with the Air Force Intelligence Agency, the National Air and Space Intelligence Center, and the National Security Agency. According to news reports, he had recently agreed to testify before Congress regarding what was described as a long-running, classified “legacy UFO program” involving crash retrieval operations across multiple federal agencies. Those sources said Sullivan claimed to have personally observed unidentified aerial objects in U.S. government custody and had been preparing to disclose those details during a congressional hearing scheduled for November 2024.” Was his death orchestrated to muzzle him? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 21 hours ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control16 views0 answers0 votesA news outlet reported: “A series of fires and explosions at oil refineries and energy installations across multiple countries—including India, the United States, Australia, Mexico, and Ecuador—has sparked global concern, particularly as these incidents coincide with the ongoing Middle East conflict involving Iran.” Is this indeed a pattern of sabotage to further stress energy supplies? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 22 hours ago • Extraterrestrial Mercenary Army Program (SSP)15 views0 answers0 votesDavid Wilcock has reportedly killed himself. Police went to his home in response to a call about “a man in a mental health crisis.” Wilcock was outside holding a gun and within minutes shot himself in the head. As a prominent UFO researcher, author, and Alien Disclosure advocate, and serving as Director of Advanced Technology and board member at Stavatti Aerospace, where he promoted next-gen military fighters, exotic propulsion and advanced aerospace concepts, this looks suspicious in adding to the 12 dead or missing top-level scientists, military and aerospace experts over the past few years with connections to exotic and possibly extraterrestrial matters. Why did this happen, and is it related to the other dead or missing persons?ClosedNicola asked 22 hours ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control21 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Creator has created our universe and a number of parallel universes. How many parallel universes are there? What is their purpose? Are they different from each other from a dimensional or future extension view point? For instance, do I exist in these parallel universes as different versions of myself? Can Creator give us a tutorial on this subject within the limited framework of our human understanding, or do we lack the vocabulary to comprehend?”ClosedNicola asked 22 hours ago • Metaphysics23 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Several writers and scholars have written books on what has been called the “Big History” of humanity, covering time way before written historical records and relying on geological, anthropological, and archaeological evidence. Some writers such as R.A. Boulay have written on humans supposed existence on Earth from about 500,000 years ago. How accurate is Boulay’s book, Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind’s Reptilian Past? It has been dismissed as “pseudoarchaeology”—interpreting myths as literal history without material evidence.”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers168 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “What was the Antikythera mechanism found in a 2000-year-old ship wreck? Seems too advanced for that era. And still remains a mystery.”ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers100 views0 answers0 votesIs the location of the first tidal power outage still the same as originally predicted, to be in the northeast US, enveloping New York and Washington D.C? What is most important for us to know?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda174 views0 answers0 votesThere are still conflicting views and opinions about the DoD Directive 5240.01, reissued on September 27, 2024. Some quoting official sources claim, adamantly, that it grants no new power to the Defense Department and does not grant legal authority for the military to use lethal force on civilians. Others maintain that the directive now permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies. Concerns are further dismissed by pointing out that lethal force can only be used with express authority of the Secretary of Defense, as though that could never be granted. A further contingency was included to allow immediate action for a 72-hour period, without such authorization. Is this just routine planning or is this a sinister manipulation to enhance potential future governmental control over citizens?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions146 views0 answers0 votesThe famous quote about the effectiveness of telling lies, from Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, has a second part that is perhaps a clue to a deeper truth: “If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it,” then Goebbels continues, “And you will even come to believe it yourself!” Is that reflecting his personal witnessing of alien mind control without realizing its sinister reach and power to manipulate human beliefs?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control288 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Problems in Society230 views0 answers0 votesThe term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Problems in Society326 views0 answers0 votesWhen people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Problems in Society266 views0 answers0 votesAn argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Problems in Society284 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola