DWQA Questions › Tag: variation
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, is the salmon’s quest for its birthplace, struggling its way upwards in steep waterfalls, a good indication or even a proof there is a Creator behind our physical universe and the diversity of species? What can Creator tell us about this peculiar behavior?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
50 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What positive purpose do innocent bugs like crickets, who fill the evenings with a cacophony of calls, serve in our world? I recall this phenomenon in the country around my old pond on the farm but have noticed it in the city as well. I had thought it was all frogs but in the city it has to be crickets. I suspect they are a marvel for us to enjoy rather than the contrary.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
491 views0 answers0 votes
The above experiment proposes a number of intriguing, and some might regard disquieting questions. We are told the future is not preordained. Yet this experiment seems to propose otherwise. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
434 views0 answers0 votes
Was Chris Robinson’s ability a result of time travel on the part of his deep subconscious and other participants such as his higher self and even Creator, and simply relaying to him in the dream state what was discovered?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
444 views0 answers0 votes
Assuming there are always multiple timelines, was it just coincidence that all ten timelines were successfully dreamed of? What if the experiment was run for 100 days, or 1000? Would he still be 100% accurate? Because the dream was always about the next day, and not the next week or next month, or next year, was the timeline more certain, more “crystalized?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
441 views0 answers0 votes
Placing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
631 views0 answers0 votes
Gaining wisdom would seem to be the proper way to graduate from consensus thinking—knowing the truth but having enough awareness that putting it on full display can be hazardous to one’s health. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help every human obtain that wisdom in the least painful and traumatic way possible?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
660 views0 answers0 votes
A client sent an article stating a set of adult identical twins recently submitted their DNA samples to five different commercial services for ancestral DNA analysis to learn about their genealogies. No two companies gave the same overall profile for either twin alone, which they explained may have been caused by using different reference panels of subjects with validated ethnicities, and differing proprietary algorithms for assigning membership to a regional grouping. But more surprisingly, all companies found differences in ancestry between the twins compared to one another. Assuming this is not just due to technical errors, what is the explanation for these twins having different DNA?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
914 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question