DWQA Questions › Tag: bias
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Do the aliens have any ability technologically to alter the energetic signatures in the akashic records? Is this another way they can mess with us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
364 views0 answers0 votes
As the Law of Karma has a kind of built-in mechanism for altering energetic signatures in the akashic records when it determines that a karmic debt has been paid, the akashic records are like a “karmic bank,” so to speak, where our indebtedness is recorded and the ledgers balanced by the actions of karma directly in response to our actions and reactions. Does karma have any notion of wisdom gained, or does it concern itself solely with energy flow and balance?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
341 views0 answers0 votes
We know from many past teachings that the best way to resolve emotional and belief issues with and by the deep subconscious is through healing. Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best means for resolving any and all issues affecting the deep subconscious and, by extension, ourselves?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
320 views0 answers0 votes
Are the caravans of migrants flooding into the United States, over 300,000 during the last month of 2023 alone, following Pied Pipers? They are marching into the teeth of the Northern Hemisphere winter. Is mind control behind much of this?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
388 views0 answers0 votes
The cofounder of Wikipedia has revealed a bombshell concerning long-running suspicions of US intelligence interference and manipulation of the world’s most well-known collaborative online encyclopedia. The site’s cocreator, Larry Sanger, spoke to journalist Glenn Greenwald on his “System Update” podcast, and outlined the known “information warfare” efforts of US intelligence, which have to some extent made Wikipedia a tool of “control” by the left-liberal Washington deep state. Sanger explained that the intelligence agencies “pay off the most influential people to push their agendas, which they’re already mostly in line with, or they just develop their own talent within the community, learn the Wikipedia game, and then push what they want to say with their own people.” “A great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online,” he added, and then specified: “on websites like Wikipedia.” For that reason along with others explored in the interview, Sanger calls it “the most biased encyclopedia” in history. He described that US intelligence manipulation of the immensely large platform and repository of information had been going on for more than a decade (Wikipedia was founded and appeared online in 2001).
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
375 views0 answers0 votes
What is Creator’s perspective on the American “Pledge of Allegiance?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
513 views0 answers0 votes
Is my assumption correct that it is ethical to do subconscious channeling with HMR on anyone without their conscious consent, because you obtain the permission of the subconscious to speak with us via channeling, and everything we facilitate involves non-leading questions the deep subconscious chooses to answer?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
418 views0 answers0 votes
Internet “memes” are one picture depictions of an issue or topic that is often comical, ironic, or even condescending and demeaning. Often used as a form of creative rebellion or opposition to an opponent, or position, it was stated recently in the article, How Donald Trump Won the 2016 Meme Wars, “Creators of these memes act as self-appointed cultural gatekeepers.” Some credit Trump supporters’ mastery of the social media meme as perhaps an important key in his winning in 2016. What is Creator’s perspective on the power and influence of memes?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
626 views0 answers0 votes
Social forum platforms like Facebook, seem to have such incredible promise as an electronic “public square” where everybody can participate, where people can debate issues, present supporting data and evidence easily, and enable everybody to become more informed at a deep level about all the myriad things impacting their lives. But the reality is, it seems very few actually want to engage at a deeply thoughtful level, and instead use the platform simply for reinforcing their already entrenched beliefs, and attacking and ridiculing anyone who tries to challenge them. Can Creator share why this ideal of an electronic public square, has so fallen short?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
643 views0 answers0 votes
In a recent online discussion, the poster of an article on a very contentious topic enjoyed an avalanche of likes and supportive comments from friends and family members of similar persuasion. But one family member tried to help soften the collective view of the opposition as everything from crazy and stupid, to downright evil. After challenging this consensus on point after point, and using evidence and scientific findings not in alignment with the embraced narrative, the creator of the thread said this, “Please don’t argue on my Facebook page. I don’t go on your page and denigrate your posts.” Can Creator comment on why so many people see a highly contentious topic thread they create as somehow equivalent to a holiday party in their backyard, with the unspoken rule that you “never criticize the host?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
470 views0 answers0 votes
Social media “trolls” and bullies are truly an epidemic. Often these are people who would never be so bold and derogatory in person. It seems every echo chamber has its self appointed “bouncer” who sees it as their job to drive away anyone who brings a dissenting opinion. Rather than engaging in a thoughtful discussion of any kind, they “go for the jugular” and call the opponent every name in the book. No amount of character assassination is too much, and even family members sit back and sometimes even cheer on the “bouncer” as they ravage a family member—something they would probably not be a party to in person. This from people who fancy themselves as highly opposed to any kind of overt bullying. Can Creator comment on this apparent hypocrisy?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
651 views0 answers0 votes
“Cancel culture” has really become a serious problem, with the potential for severe, even grave repercussions for people who fall victim. Social media has seemingly enabled and fueled this trend, making it easier than ever before for a snitch to adversely alter the lives of the ideological opposition. Can Creator comment on the danger that cancel culture presents?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
576 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share how the misuse of social media can create negative karma, and how the Lightworker Healing Protocol can both heal and protect individuals from the ravages and negative impact of social media?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
622 views0 answers0 votes
A number of disadvantaged immigrant groups assimilate into US culture successfully. Is the persistent problem of disrupted families due to absent fathers, crime, drug use, and homelessness in black communities caused by the karma of cultural subjugation through slavery, or is there a more sinister direct manipulation to undermine blacks through subconscious programming by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to greatly worsen their plight?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
603 views0 answers0 votes
In what percentage of court cases are juries influenced by extraterrestrial mind control manipulation in rendering their verdicts?
ClosedNicola asked 7 years ago • 
725 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123Next »
Ask Question