DWQA Questions › Tag: Creator's planFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “This question is asked in reference to Karl’s previous channeling of Source Creator on 10-28-25. [A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective? “This can be requested to happen—the application of the benefits of antiviral supplements be transferred to everyone, everywhere, across all timelines—but this will not be uniformly effective because each individual situation, time, place, circumstance, and the people involved will have an energetic matrix that will govern the energetics of what is allowable with respect to divine intervention and all of the variables, such as levels of belief in the divine, belief in the self, and the inner barriers to change from corrupted beliefs about one’s physical makeup and circumstances. People believe in their illnesses and this is a barrier to divine healing. So this is a highly variable and uncertain undertaking but it can be requested for more to be done.” The above channeling, describing barriers to divine intervention for implementation of antiviral supplement benefits across timelines, seems unsurprising. The same restrictions apply quite variably, to potentially every request in both the LHP and DSMR protocols. Divine intervention is always uncertain as to the degree and effectiveness allowable, depending on individual circumstances and energies. Is there a workaround we are unaware of that would help this sharing of antiviral healing and protection be more uniformly potent? Knowing these barriers exist, can we simply request they be transmuted into welcoming and amplifying positive energies?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol30 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Many people assume the self is mostly fixed, defined by circumstances, something to “find,” not something you shape or choose. But modern psychology sees the self as constructed, context-sensitive, and changeable. Some philosophers and New Age advocates also claim we can choose who we become. We seem to have part of us that defines an “automatic experience of reality” that decides what becomes “real” for us but we also seem to have a capacity to choose a new “intentional reality” as a story we choose and create by changing how we interpret things via our beliefs and biases. Can Creator give a brief tutorial to explain this dilemma to help us intentionally create better versions of ourselves?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Guidance35 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Richard J. Davidson, author of “The Emotional Life of Your Brain”, says understanding the brain increases agency over emotional reactions. He claims you can train the brain to respond differently to challenges and that with the right mental exercises, and habits, it’s possible to reshape neural pathways, enhance resilience, attention, and overall emotional well-being. For example, he claims that naming an emotion activates the prefrontal cortex, which helps regulate the brain’s fear-and-stress center. He says the prefrontal cortex can also regulate other emotion-generating regions (amygdala, insula, hippocampus). How effective are these suggestions in gaining agency over emotional reaction?”ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Guidance24 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The classical view of emotions is they “happen to you” – regulation means managing reactions after they occur (e.g., calming down when angry). Lisa Feldman Barrett’s Theory of Constructed Emotion however argues that emotions are constructed (based on context, past learning, and bodily input) rather than hardwired biological and universal responses. If correct, practices like increasing body awareness, expanding emotional vocabulary, and reframing experiences can change the way we build emotions in real time. How well can this framework be used to turn emotional reactions into something we can consciously shape, meaning we have agency over how we feel, rather than just endure?”ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Guidance22 views0 answers0 votesCan you help us better understand the role of the Higher Self? Does it cause things to happen by directing healing energy for divine interventions and their implementation, or is its role strictly for observing, monitoring, and reporting current status as a kind of sentinel? Can you give us a tutorial about the role of the higher self in maintaining physical and emotional well-being and for healing when things get out of alignment?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Higher Self232 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol117 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol101 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol74 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol86 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Creator says killing is wrong and to avoid killing another if possible. Why do we have to kill animals to survive? Does this come from interloper manipulation? Or is the idea of killing to survive an intentional plan? Is there a better way to survive? I’m thinking that with the plans coming up, we’ll have to become more self-sufficient. I can see that raising our own food would be a healthier source of food. However, I don’t think I would have the heart to kill an animal. Is there an easier way to have meat without killing? For example, could I ask an animal to give themselves up, then wake up the next morning to a dead animal ready to be processed for consumption? This sounds crazy but it came to mind and I’m wondering if it’s possible.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divine Guidance92 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “As a commandment, are we still to keep the sabbath holy and not work on Sunday or Saturday?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divine Guidance98 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Recently a young adult female elephant gored a senior keeper at an African elephant orphanage which led to the death of the much loved 70 year old father of eight. The elephant was out browsing with its herd when it uprooted a tree thus blocking a dirt road. As members of staff started to clear up the branches, it turned on the senior keeper and gored him. The man died of his wounds later, much to the dismay and sadness of his family and the local community. The elephant, not an orphan itself, didn’t have a history of trauma so why did it do this? Did the negative ET alliance have a hand in this? What actions could the staff, community and family take to optimally heal from this tragedy?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Animal Issues96 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “As a young man I had a very deep romantic interest in a woman, who accepted my friendship, and we became close but not romantic despite my best efforts. One day I knew we were both free, I called her to try to make a date and she never got back to me. Next time we talked she said she had called me that same day to get together with me and hadn’t heard back. When I went back to check the call log she had called me at the exact same time I had called her and I never got a notification. It seemed fate had intervened to dash my opportunity. Was this a coincidence? Karmic? Divine intervention? Sabotage from dark forces somehow?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Karma73 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Problems in Society155 views0 answers0 votesThe term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • Problems in Society245 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola