DWQA Questions › Tag: divine guidance
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Can amyloidosis be caused by a chronic virus, and if so, in what percent of cases?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I have always used finger testing when doing an LHP or DSMR session. I usually don’t get any flashes of insight while doing the sessions. I have more recently started using finger testing to ask if someone has gone to the light, or if I should do something in my personal life that I am questioning. I usually double check the answer to make sure I get the same answer two times in a row. Intuitively, I feel this has become a very accurate way to ask Creator something and get an accurate answer. Is my intuition correct, or is finger testing still a more iffy way to get an answer from Creator?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
33 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are contact lenses generally safe, or are there inherent risks to be aware of? If there are risks, how can they be mitigated?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
A newsletter from Ty and Charlene Bollinger titled “The Epstein Files: Exposing Satanic Globalist Pedophiles Raping, Torturing, and Eating Babies?” says: “The people in charge aren’t merely corrupt. They’re not merely criminals. They’re cannibal pedophiles engaged in active spiritual warfare against everything pure, everything innocent, everything good.” They claim that the Department of Justice has a video showing Hillary Clinton and her friend, Huma Abedin, torturing a young girl prior to harvesting her tissues for consuming adrenochrome, as has been described a number of times is a routine practice by global elites wanting to gain longevity from the practice. Is there such a video and is it being accurately depicted?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
293 views0 answers0 votes
Are the basic allegations true, that there are many emails in the released Epstein files referring to child trafficking through code words, including adrenochrome harvesting through cannibalism?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
174 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the whistleblowing email I received some time ago, with documents listing children enslaved and their harvested post-torture blood for sale, connected to this same large-scale enterprise?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
116 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will this practice of child enslavement and their harvested post-torture blood for sale be revealed during the coming Alien Disclosure as shocking evidence of corruption in our midst, with blaming of the Reptilian extraterrestrials and their influence?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
143 views0 answers0 votes
Is the video authentic they show of Jeffrey Epstein torturing a naked young girl staked out on the ground, by burning her with sunlight through a magnifying glass?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
147 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “It appears that part of the ET agenda is to immerse the public in the disturbing sexual perversions of high-level figures lately. For those who want to be in spiritual alignment this feels like a kind of attack to try and darken as many as possible. Is there heavy mind control associated with these disturbing revelations to try and darken humanity? I feel a need to be cautious in what I choose to watch online.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
163 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have been wearing glasses since I was young. I suspect I actually didn’t need them, but it was foisted on me due to a concerned family friend who raised the alarm to my parents when I complained of not being able to see the blackboard from the back of the classroom. I think this was a temporary fluctuation in vision acuity, but the glasses themselves paralyze eye muscles and lock in bad vision. First of all, is my theory correct that the glasses themselves deteriorated my eyesight to the point of a vicious cycle of dependency?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
106 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Glasses and contact lenses are a nuisance to me. I am athletic and they get in the way. I have rejected LASIK eye surgery until now due to the risks. However, recently, I have been thinking more about it. It would be liberating not to have to depend on glasses or contacts anymore. I think it would make me more resilient physically, especially considering the tough times ahead, as well as protect me from the risk of not having my glasses on hand (they can break, too) or running out of contact lenses. I also get uncomfortable with glasses and contacts, and sometimes get headaches. They sure do get in the way of fun as well. And I spend a lot of time in front of the computer, and again, vision correction causes extra strain. I know several people that have done the surgery and they report no problems years after. But there are also lots of warnings about risks, such as blurry vision and regression after some time. Overall, I know the divine realm is not in favor of surgery. Considering that we need to be in top form with minimal obstacles to effectiveness for the mission, and considering that I am also supported by the protocols to mitigate risks, would it be best for me to do this procedure? Or are there serious risks that could become a net negative and is it best to continue relying on glasses/contact lenses?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
A recent paper describes health data from 8,407,849 citizens of South Korea, comparing those within one year of receiving shots for Covid-19 with a group never receiving shots. There were statistically significant increases in overall cancer risk and for six types of cancer: thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate. Risk of cancer was greater with both mRNA vaccines (thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancer) and cDNA vaccines (thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers). Administration of booster shots was associated with increased risk of three cancers (gastric, pancreatic, and leukemia). [Kim et al. Biomarker Research 13:114, 2025.] Are these data accurately reflecting a real risk from receiving such shots? Is the increased risk of cancer despite the type of vaccine, pointing to something sinister which is not the vaccine technology itself being dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
123…66Next »
Ask Question