A practitioner asks: “I have always used finger testing when doing an LHP or DSMR session. I usually don’t get any flashes of insight while doing the sessions. I have more recently started using finger testing to ask if someone has gone to the light, or if I should do something in my personal life that I am questioning. I usually double check the answer to make sure I get the same answer two times in a row. Intuitively, I feel this has become a very accurate way to ask Creator something and get an accurate answer. Is my intuition correct, or is finger testing still a more iffy way to get an answer from Creator?”

This is difficult to answer because not only will this vary from person to person it will vary within the experience of a single individual from time to time for a host of possible reasons. Some things are easy to get accurate, intuitive, guidance in that fashion from the higher self or Creator in assisting that readout. But there may be variability coming from the deep subconscious and the upper layers of the subconscious mind that might vary in openness and the effects of inner fear to cause false readouts, and the latter is all too common. In fact, it is a major reason why most people find finger strength testing unreliable to begin with, really no better than chance and in some cases worse. There is a large body of data on the part of those analyzing intuitive readouts from skeptics who do not believe in paranormal phenomena, including extrasensory perception or intuition by another name. It is not unusual for such a group of individuals, when tested carefully in a scientific fashion, to get highly significant consistency in answers based on statistical analysis of such a readout. But paradoxically, skeptics may well perform with significantly less than 50% accuracy. What that shows is their subconscious beliefs that it is impossible to be intuitive, and knowing things outside conscious awareness might be avoided by the subconscious mind to ensure that intuitive gateway is not listened to in a test situation. It shows that people can trip themselves up for any number of reasons. Having doubts or fears constitutes the largest source of error making such evaluations risky to rely on. Experience with such approaches has shown that the more that is at stake, the less accurate the readings might be and, perversely, that is when you most want to know an answer. No one is one hundred percent guaranteed that such an approach will work for them consistently. Unfortunately, we cannot be leading here because there is enough variability that we can create a false sense of confidence, and if that leads to a bad outcome would constitute a karmic error on our part.