DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial genetic manipulationsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesBoth Sutphen and his good friend, Richard Bach, author of the 1970s surprise bestseller, Jonathan Livingston Seagull, had their life savings and even copyrights on all their intellectual property stolen from them. The two thefts were not otherwise related. Both were left absolutely destitute. Bach’s manager stole his, and in 2011 some hacker drained Sutphen’s bank accounts, transferred his copyrights, and wiped out all the master copies of his life’s work. It took three years of lawsuits just to get his copyrights back, but everything else was gone. Can Creator share if Empowered Prayer and/or the Lightworker Healing Protocol could have prevented these evil attacks and tragedy that neither man fully recovered from?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma436 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I was impulsed to reach out to you and ask you what you feel about providing some type of direction for those that are starting to ramp up their dreaming without proper direction. People can “steer” their presence in the dreamscape, and this is never talked about at GetWisdom. Not really. Not the type of detail that could be not only instructional but incredibly beneficial. It occurred to me that if we’re going to go down that rabbit hole of asking the subconscious to work with dreams, the dreamer, in my opinion, should have some type of direction as to how to steer and navigate the dreams that are starting to manifest. Yes, that said, Creator knows best, and perhaps I’m reaching too far?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness386 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “My wish is that, at some point, people will be able to do their own Deep Subconscious Channeling with Holographic Memory Resolution (DSC-HMR), with intent, while dreaming. We have seen that this is doable, right?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Channeling368 views0 answers0 votesIs the current plan to take over human society by putting people under the complete domination and control of the alien Greys to be done through mind control manipulation to keep us complacent, control of us by force, or a gradual replacement of all human pregnancies with an extraterrestrial hybrid being that will be raised by the human parents as their own and humans being phased out?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control505 views0 answers0 votesIs it possible to do healing work via subconscious channeling on Anunnaki, Reptilian, or Arcturian extraterrestrials without their conscious awareness, or is that capability unique for humans because of the deep subconscious disconnect imposed by Anunnaki tinkering with the human genome long ago?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Channeling473 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Would it be wrong to ask Creator that, in pregnancies where the fetus has been stolen by extraterrestrials and replaced by a soul-less hybrid or clone, that those interloping interjections into the woman’s body without her consent be removed or ended in some way so that the pregnancy will not continue to term? My rationale is that since these implants pretending to be human fetuses do not have souls, would this not be much different from removing another kind of alien implant from a human’s body?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Abductions458 views0 answers0 votesWith so many human pregnancies consisting of extraterrestrial hybrid implants, are these being removed as a consequence of the Lightworker Healing Protocol request for removal of alien implants? If not, would this be appropriate to ask for explicitly in the Protocol?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Abductions502 views0 answers0 votesIs the strategy of reducing human fertility also coupled with the plan to implant human/alien Grey hybrids, to be raised within human families as an infiltration into our society so they can attack from within?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Genetic Manipulations448 views0 answers0 votesWhen reading material written by skeptics denying the existence of an afterlife, spirits, etc., their biggest agenda seems to be, “Do whatever it takes to avoid having to settle on a paranormal explanation for ANYTHING.” Why do these people have such a deep-seated aversion to the very notion of the paranormal? It’s almost as if the paranormal traumatizes them. Is that a valid insight? Could these people actually benefit from Deep Subconscious Trauma Resolution?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness486 views0 answers0 votesIncluded in a skeptical article in the collection, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, was this VERY interesting reference, “Another recent study compared Theravada Buddhist Monks with lay novices … The authors found far more (brain) activity in the practiced monks than the novices during meditation, noting that the monks were able to dramatically self-regulate the activity of their frontoparietal and left insular areas.” This one statement dramatically undercuts the assertion that the brain controls ALL mental activity and not the other way around. Yet, it was nonchalantly included in an article whose agenda was to (quote) “Argue that the mind is located in the brain in such a way that there is no mental life after brain death … Our conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by neuroscientific evidence.” Yet they inexplicably include a neuroscientific case study that dramatically undercuts that conclusion. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness575 views0 answers0 votesIn an earlier show, Creator agreed with the statement, “You will learn more about reality by studying the extraordinary, than the ordinary.” Yet the ordinary is the focus of the skeptics in their attempts to prove that the paranormal is make-believe. In fact, skeptics have elevated this proclivity to have the force of law. In the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, behavioral geneticist Jene Mercer writes, “The law of parsimony, a guiding rule for scientists for hundreds of years, states that given two equally well-supported explanations for a phenomena, we are best advised to choose the simpler one rather than multiplying entities unnecessarily.” Skeptics routinely “choose the simpler” by ignoring and throwing out exceptions and outliers in their data, all the while congratulating themselves for being scientific. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness437 views0 answers0 votesActress Marilu Henner is one of less than a hundred people in the world with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory. She can literally remember every detail of her life. But she doesn’t appear to “remember” the way most do. Her son once asked her after testing her memory, “You’ve never explained how you do that?” Her reply was, “I don’t DO it, I just SEE it.” Others equated it to having Google in your brain. Is her deep subconscious pulling everything out of the akashic records on demand, and presenting it to her visually? Is this ability granted as a “mission life” to simply be a non-threatening billboard for what’s possible? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness484 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, Tesla: Man Out of Time, by Margaret Cheney, she quoted Nikola Tesla, who talked about having, “A peculiar affliction due to the appearance of images, often accompanied by strong flashes of light, which marred the sight of real objects and interfered with my thought and action. They were pictures of things and scenes which I had really seen, never of those I imagined. When a word was spoken to me, the image of the object it designated would present itself vividly to my vision and sometimes I was quite unable to distinguish whether what I saw was tangible or not.” Cheney continues, “In the stillness of the night, the vivid picture of a funeral he had seen or some other disturbing scene would thrust itself before his eyes, so that even if he jabbed his hand through it, it would remain fixed in space.” What can Creator tell us about this ability of Tesla’s? Does Marilu Henner see her memories in a similar fashion?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness482 views0 answers0 votesCheney quotes Tesla about his amazing visualization ability, “My method is different … I do not rush into actual work. When I get an idea I start at once building it up in my imagination. I change the construction, make improvements and operate the device in my mind. It is absolutely immaterial to me whether I run my turbine in my thought or test it in my shop. I even note if it is out of balance.” Cheney writes, “He claimed he was able to perfect a conception without touching anything. Only when all the faults had been corrected in his brain, did he put the device into concrete form.” Most people cannot begin to relate to this kind of ability. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness470 views0 answers0 votesBrian made it through law school without taking notes. Not because he had a photographic memory, but because he couldn’t remember what the professor said long enough to write it down. Yet he made it through and passed the bar exam on his ability to intuit the law. He just seemed to grasp what the law was, correctly, for nearly any fact set presented. In his case, an unusual handicap was offset by an equally unusual analytical ability. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness491 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola