DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial withdrawal
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Get Wisdom was a very small needle in a haystack 5 years ago and there were relatively few members. I wonder what brought me to the Get Wisdom member who subsequently told me about Get Wisdom. I remember becoming interested in ET life around 9 years ago so would it be true to say that my higher self was sending me hints via my deep subconscious in order that I may eventually discover Get Wisdom ? If this happened exclusively via my Higher Self as described then why have only a small number discovered Get Wisdom so far? There must be more ingredients and if so, what? Divine alignment? Soul attributes?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
81 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “For a while now I have felt increasing difficulty in doing the protocols leaning towards inability. Today I asked my guidance if they are cautioning me to back off on them. I can usually get through the daily prayers but the second I start the protocols my energy and brain function are zapped more than usual. I believe they said yes, this is the case. I know our prayers are shielded but this feels like maybe an energetic situation that may get me noticed. When I accepted the message this morning that yes they are counseling me at this time to back off on doing the protocols the headache that is almost my constant companion diminished very greatly. Can you ask Creator if this is indeed what the Divine is suggesting. I’m so dedicated to doing the protocols. They really are what I’m living for although I would not describe my existence as really living. More like a constant horror much like Dante’s Inferno depictions. I was ranting at my spirit team telling them they needed to get creative in helping me as my existence is unconscionable and they need to do better. I was asking if they were frustrated that they hadn’t been able to do better on my part and the message I got was that they were actually feeling quite accomplished that I was still in the living. It felt like a mic drop moment. I guess I just need confirmation that it is the Divine and not the darkness recommending the current course of stopping the protocols until such time that they communicate to me that it is safe to start again.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
42 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “TLS, The Light System, claims to be an ancient organization working for the light. Whose gone public to expose the corrupt and prepare us for Disclosure and contact with “Good ETs.” Jason Shurka is their chosen spokesman and host for Unifyd Healing TV, and the Unifyd Healing Network. Ray claims to be a reincarnation from biblical bloodlines and is featured in many docuseries on the network. They have supported the spread of EE System Centers around the globe in a few short years. Promoting a protocol in the system to prepare for contact. Is TLS the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Is the EE System safe or weaponized? Are the power outages the false flag? What is most imp for us to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer continues to ask about their grandson who is a targeted individual: “Will he improve after the interlopers withdraw?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
61 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer continues to ask about their grandson who is a targeted individual: “Will the LHP help with this? Can Creator tell us what can we do to help him?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
34 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
50 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
Is my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
Tech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
149 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
123…7Next »
Ask Question