DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial withdrawal
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
You have said to us many times that the interlopers are carrying out a Trojan Horse maneuver to deceive us in representing themselves as benevolent white-hat ETs who are here to help save us from the black-hat variety who have infiltrated our world. Is the current rollout and escalation of the mad dash to create ever-more-powerful AI systems, in effect, a Trojan Horse bringing a kind of false-hope with alien encouragement that will ultimately backfire, causing damage and economic losses from within our own infrastructure?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
Recent channeling to probe a client’s business plans, which rely heavily on Artificial Intelligence support and implementation, were pessimistic about things working out. Was this an objective assessment?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
The concerns raised about vulnerability of internal Artificial Intelligence systems to being breached and corrupted, even the surreptitious creation of a back door allowing unfettered interloper access, would seem to predict likelihood of things going wrong, inevitably, and quite possibly to a catastrophic degree. Is this going to be seen almost universally across industries that have embraced and depend on AI for their infrastructure? Is that the plan? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
Will this systemic failure of company Artificial Intelligence platforms even be coordinated to happen all at once to generate a crippling chaos?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
It is difficult for me to tell from this channeling to what degree, if any, using Artificial Intelligence could be considered wise. It is clear from the discussion that advanced agentic AI systems pose greater dangers from going rogue, not only allowing intrusive clandestine oversight and manipulation, but fatal sabotaging of operations. But what safety guarantees exist that today’s simpler platforms won’t be altered by the interlopers to allow higher-level manipulations and damaging actions?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
You told us recently that human reliance on Artificial Intelligence would prove to be a costly mistake and many problems and limitations would become evident, but that the Extraterrestrial Alliance is not counting on existing platforms to become a doomsday device during their planned absence. This new channeling seems more dark, and even uses the term “doomsday device.” Does the interloper planning envision a more important role of AI failures to continue softening up humanity for their eventual annihilation? Is one important factor for the delay in launching the planned sequence of major catalysts, starting with the tidal power outages, the need for more time to put in place greater human reliance on AI systems and to ensure they are sufficiently corrupted?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
76 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Get Wisdom was a very small needle in a haystack 5 years ago and there were relatively few members. I wonder what brought me to the Get Wisdom member who subsequently told me about Get Wisdom. I remember becoming interested in ET life around 9 years ago so would it be true to say that my higher self was sending me hints via my deep subconscious in order that I may eventually discover Get Wisdom ? If this happened exclusively via my Higher Self as described then why have only a small number discovered Get Wisdom so far? There must be more ingredients and if so, what? Divine alignment? Soul attributes?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
142 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “For a while now I have felt increasing difficulty in doing the protocols leaning towards inability. Today I asked my guidance if they are cautioning me to back off on them. I can usually get through the daily prayers but the second I start the protocols my energy and brain function are zapped more than usual. I believe they said yes, this is the case. I know our prayers are shielded but this feels like maybe an energetic situation that may get me noticed. When I accepted the message this morning that yes they are counseling me at this time to back off on doing the protocols the headache that is almost my constant companion diminished very greatly. Can you ask Creator if this is indeed what the Divine is suggesting. I’m so dedicated to doing the protocols. They really are what I’m living for although I would not describe my existence as really living. More like a constant horror much like Dante’s Inferno depictions. I was ranting at my spirit team telling them they needed to get creative in helping me as my existence is unconscionable and they need to do better. I was asking if they were frustrated that they hadn’t been able to do better on my part and the message I got was that they were actually feeling quite accomplished that I was still in the living. It felt like a mic drop moment. I guess I just need confirmation that it is the Divine and not the darkness recommending the current course of stopping the protocols until such time that they communicate to me that it is safe to start again.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
96 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “TLS, The Light System, claims to be an ancient organization working for the light. Whose gone public to expose the corrupt and prepare us for Disclosure and contact with “Good ETs.” Jason Shurka is their chosen spokesman and host for Unifyd Healing TV, and the Unifyd Healing Network. Ray claims to be a reincarnation from biblical bloodlines and is featured in many docuseries on the network. They have supported the spread of EE System Centers around the globe in a few short years. Promoting a protocol in the system to prepare for contact. Is TLS the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Is the EE System safe or weaponized? Are the power outages the false flag? What is most imp for us to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer continues to ask about their grandson who is a targeted individual: “Will he improve after the interlopers withdraw?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer continues to ask about their grandson who is a targeted individual: “Will the LHP help with this? Can Creator tell us what can we do to help him?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
81 views0 answers0 votes
123…7Next »
Ask Question