DWQA Questions › Tag: human ingenuityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “I would really like to hear from Creator as to whether or not the combination of lemon juice, maple syrup, and cayenne pepper is good for the body.” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Healing Modalities269 views0 answers0 votesShe says: “Many people are unaware that lemon juice is actually alkalizing for the blood because while it is indeed comprised of citric acid, it leaves an alkaline ash.” Is this true, and a problem?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Healing Modalities309 views0 answers0 votesIs it helpful to request the help of the deep subconscious to work actively with the higher self and Creator by requesting assistance as needed?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Channeling247 views0 answers0 votesIs it realistic and advisable to ask when channeling the deep subconscious to protect itself from outside intrusions? If so, what is the most effective way to do so?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Channeling246 views0 answers0 votesIs cellular memory in the brain mediated via glial cells? A variety of glial cells whose purpose is still not completely understood have been discovered in many tissues outside the brain. Is cellular memory mediated via glial cells in tissues body-wide?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind283 views0 answers0 votesSource Creator, why can new clients expect to have equal benefit from a Lightworker Healing Protocol session done by my partner, Denny Hunt, as would be done by me personally?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol266 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “I’m impulsed to immediately report on some ideas about increasing the effectiveness of prayer requests. While working on the felled trees the other day I noticed some chemtrails starting to lay down a grid. It was only two lines but I wanted to nip it in the bud so I thought, “Source Creator, please clear the sky of chemtrails. Thank you.” And went back to work on the tree. A few minutes later I looked up to see if I needed to repeat the prayer and saw they were completely gone. No trails or planes. Usually, they hang in the air for hours but it was sky blue in minutes. I completed the cycle with “Thank you, Source Creator, for clearing the sky of chemtrails,” and they did not return that day.” Were his prayers a factor in clearing the sky?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer291 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “I think one of the things that helps make a prayer effective is that there’s a distinction between the idea of faith versus assumption of result. If you put air in a tire the assumption-of-result is it will fill up with air. If it doesn’t fill up with air then the natural thing would be to check for leaks then fill it up again, and the assumption is that if you do that enough it will definitely work at some point. When I looked back in the sky, I was not wondering about the idea of strength of faith but just checking as a matter of practicality if I need to repeat the prayer. I wonder if, because time is nonlinear, the success of the original prayer is determined, at least in part, by the mindset when the person looks at the result. If the mindset is about the idea of testing to see if the prayer caused the divine to act, then it is less effective since that is tied to the idea of the requester trying to train the divine which is backwards. On the other hand, if the mindset is checking to see if the requester needs to fill in gaps or add more of their own contribution, then the original prayer is more effective. In that case, the requester is checking their own performance and not on the divine’s performance. This gives the green light to go back in time and make the prayer work instantly, or perhaps shift timelines, or however it works.” Is this an accurate analysis? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer250 views0 answers0 votesIn a recent radio show on Academic Gatekeeping, Creator shared this, “The reality is the biggest part of the mind is unreachable to conscious awareness or even ordinary hypnotic trance procedures.” Can Creator expand on the use of the word “ordinary” in this context? Dr. Milton H. Erickson was no “ordinary” hypnotist. Did ANY of his techniques and methodologies reach and/or influence the deep subconscious, even though he certainly had no complete appreciation of the true reality and nature of what it was he was interacting with?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind252 views0 answers0 votesMilton Erickson spent a day in 1950 at the home of Aldous Huxley. Huxley is the celebrated author of A Brave New World. Huxley did a form of self-hypnosis he called “Deep Reflection.” On that day Erickson and Huxley did some remarkable consciousness explorations. The two men had agreed to jointly publish a collaborative work on their findings. A decade passed, and Erickson was looking to bring the collaborative project to fruition when disaster struck. Huxley lost his home and all his notes and manuscripts in the great Bel-Air, California fire of 1961. Afterward, Huxley informed Erickson that he would not resume their collaboration—the loss was too great. What’s the story behind this disaster, and was Huxley specifically targeted with a backlash for his life’s work?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind268 views0 answers0 votesThe word “somnambulist” is the label for sleepwalkers. Erickson and other hypnotists use the word to also describe a person who enters a trance state from which they emerge with full amnesia (a total forgetting) of the trance, and everything that occurred during it, just like sleepwalkers when they awaken. Can Creator share with us what’s behind sleepwalking and why it affects some people but not others?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind265 views0 answers0 votesSome people even go into a somnambulistic trance when driving and report that hours can pass by without their conscious awareness or any recollection of the drive itself. Yet they safely reach their destination, as if by “magic.” The other day, Brian was driving his daughter home and engaged in a conversation with her. Suddenly he found himself on a familiar street going in a direction away from his destination. Brian realized he had no recollection of making the necessary right-hand turn to get on that street. He had a full amnesia of it. This was the first time in his entire life, that he vividly experienced this phenomenon with full recognition of the implications. Was this orchestrated to happen? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind265 views0 answers0 votesIt appears the conscious or “awake” mind can focus on only one task at a time. For instance, the conscious mind cannot read a book and do a counting exercise at the same time. Yet when hypnotized to the somnambulistic level (the level that results in amnesia upon awakening), this ability to multitask has been readily demonstrated. Can Creator explain why this is so, and what levels of the mind are participating?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind259 views0 answers0 votesErickson treated a couple of patients with an affective (wholly psychological) writing disorder. Neither could write but could do any number of other complex hand tasks like using tools or knitting. He was unable to treat one of the patients, but with the other, he used hypnosis to “transfer” the handicap to the other non writing hand. This finally enabled this patient to resume writing successfully, but with the effect that the other hand would go numb, every time they went to write something. So while this is difficult to label a “healing,” it is a creative workaround to the problem and was a great help to the patient. What was really happening here, why was Erickson successful with one, but not the other patient, and what is truly needed to heal such disorders?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind257 views0 answers0 votesErickson mentioned a little-known phenomenon to folks who don’t work in extremely loud industrial settings. For old-timers in these settings, it is not uncommon for two acclimated workers to be able to carry on a “normal” conversation, at normal volume levels, when outsiders can’t hear each other even when shouting in close proximity. How is this even possible? This appears to be a phenomenon almost akin to telepathy. It certainly seems to defy our understanding of hearing biology. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Subconscious Mind292 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola