DWQA Questions › Tag: political agenda
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The Jewish Anti-Defamation League has reported that incidents of anti-Semitism increased 36% in 2022 to the highest level since 1979, and have further exploded 316% in the month since the attack on Israel by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. This has an eerie resemblance to the start of the Holocaust in Germany during the 1930s, which was preceded by a worldwide surge of anti-Semitism. Is this because the interlopers are re-using the same playbook to stir up trouble again?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
The cofounder of Wikipedia has revealed a bombshell concerning long-running suspicions of US intelligence interference and manipulation of the world’s most well-known collaborative online encyclopedia. The site’s cocreator, Larry Sanger, spoke to journalist Glenn Greenwald on his “System Update” podcast, and outlined the known “information warfare” efforts of US intelligence, which have to some extent made Wikipedia a tool of “control” by the left-liberal Washington deep state. Sanger explained that the intelligence agencies “pay off the most influential people to push their agendas, which they’re already mostly in line with, or they just develop their own talent within the community, learn the Wikipedia game, and then push what they want to say with their own people.” “A great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online,” he added, and then specified: “on websites like Wikipedia.” For that reason along with others explored in the interview, Sanger calls it “the most biased encyclopedia” in history. He described that US intelligence manipulation of the immensely large platform and repository of information had been going on for more than a decade (Wikipedia was founded and appeared online in 2001).
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Has a question to Creator been asked recently if extraterrestrials are ramping up their agenda to bring down societies/countries with the actions of top leaders and the recent meetings in Davos and the Globalists’ agenda?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
169 views0 answers0 votes
Shortly after President Trump announced he planned to bring American troops home from Syria there was suddenly another chemical weapon attack. There is no logical reason for President Assad to stir up things in this way because he can only gain with US withdrawal. Was this another false flag operation by US intelligence or other dark forces to prevent peaceful withdrawal of US military?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
The Pleiadians seemed to CONFIRM what Dana Ashlie’s film suggested, that the next four to five months, and especially election day itself, as well as the “scheduled” inauguration day at the end of January, will be HIGHLY volatile. To the point that if the inauguration occurs at all, it won’t be anything remotely approaching “normal.” Do the current energies project dire events or are the fears unwarranted?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
313 views0 answers0 votes
GetWisdom is trying to utilize social media to get Creator’s message out to as wide an audience as possible. But for all its promise, most people end up in a political, religious, and social “echo chamber” within these platforms. How much of this is just human tribalism, versus an intentional engineering of the platforms themselves to segregate people this way?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
241 views0 answers0 votes
Internet “memes” are one picture depictions of an issue or topic that is often comical, ironic, or even condescending and demeaning. Often used as a form of creative rebellion or opposition to an opponent, or position, it was stated recently in the article, How Donald Trump Won the 2016 Meme Wars, “Creators of these memes act as self-appointed cultural gatekeepers.” Some credit Trump supporters’ mastery of the social media meme as perhaps an important key in his winning in 2016. What is Creator’s perspective on the power and influence of memes?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
248 views0 answers0 votes
Social forum platforms like Facebook, seem to have such incredible promise as an electronic “public square” where everybody can participate, where people can debate issues, present supporting data and evidence easily, and enable everybody to become more informed at a deep level about all the myriad things impacting their lives. But the reality is, it seems very few actually want to engage at a deeply thoughtful level, and instead use the platform simply for reinforcing their already entrenched beliefs, and attacking and ridiculing anyone who tries to challenge them. Can Creator share why this ideal of an electronic public square, has so fallen short?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
246 views0 answers0 votes
In a recent online discussion, the poster of an article on a very contentious topic enjoyed an avalanche of likes and supportive comments from friends and family members of similar persuasion. But one family member tried to help soften the collective view of the opposition as everything from crazy and stupid, to downright evil. After challenging this consensus on point after point, and using evidence and scientific findings not in alignment with the embraced narrative, the creator of the thread said this, “Please don’t argue on my Facebook page. I don’t go on your page and denigrate your posts.” Can Creator comment on why so many people see a highly contentious topic thread they create as somehow equivalent to a holiday party in their backyard, with the unspoken rule that you “never criticize the host?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
269 views0 answers0 votes
Social media “trolls” and bullies are truly an epidemic. Often these are people who would never be so bold and derogatory in person. It seems every echo chamber has its self appointed “bouncer” who sees it as their job to drive away anyone who brings a dissenting opinion. Rather than engaging in a thoughtful discussion of any kind, they “go for the jugular” and call the opponent every name in the book. No amount of character assassination is too much, and even family members sit back and sometimes even cheer on the “bouncer” as they ravage a family member—something they would probably not be a party to in person. This from people who fancy themselves as highly opposed to any kind of overt bullying. Can Creator comment on this apparent hypocrisy?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
305 views0 answers0 votes
Social media has seemingly given birth to “virtue signaling.” A means by which you signal your membership with a group of people who supposedly espouse the same values by posting approved content, liking approved content, and defending approved content. Rather than a means by which greater diversity of thought can blossom, virtue signaling becomes a means by which you tow the social media party line. What is Creator’s view of virtue signaling?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
263 views0 answers0 votes
“Cancel culture” has really become a serious problem, with the potential for severe, even grave repercussions for people who fall victim. Social media has seemingly enabled and fueled this trend, making it easier than ever before for a snitch to adversely alter the lives of the ideological opposition. Can Creator comment on the danger that cancel culture presents?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
261 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share how the misuse of social media can create negative karma, and how the Lightworker Healing Protocol can both heal and protect individuals from the ravages and negative impact of social media?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
249 views0 answers0 votes
Was Pres. Trump’s recent decision to not launch a military strike against Iran following their downing of a US unmanned drone, a cynical ploy to burnish his image as a would-be peacemaker, or was this a divine intervention to dampen the rush to war with Iran being promoted by the deep state?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
413 views0 answers0 votes
A new book being published, Unfreedom of the Press, documents the fact that leading newspapers of the WWII era, including the New York Times, barely remarked about the ongoing Holocaust. The fact that little is taught about the Holocaust in schools worldwide is often attributed to political bias of the left, or latent anti Semitism making people uncomfortable about the topic so there is a reluctance to report about or discuss it. Is there a deeper, more sinister cover-up still happening?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
349 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »