DWQA Questions › Tag: AllahFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesCastaneda wrote: Don Juan “said that there is nothing more dangerous than the evil fixation of the second attention (or evil mastery of the intuitive faculties). When warriors (or seekers/seers or shaman/sorcerers) learn to focus on the weak side of the second attention nothing can stand in their way. They become hunters of men, ghouls. Even if they are no longer alive, they can reach for their prey through time as if they were present here and now.” How big is the problem of dead evil sorcerers? Are these some of the human hybrid spirits that seem to have partnered with the fallen angelics? If they were particularly adept sorcerers when alive, might their powers even exceed that of some of the fallen angelics, similar in the way that Anunnaki spirits manage to control and repurpose the fallen angelics for evil aims?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness304 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “… all archaeological ruins in Mexico, especially the pyramids, were harmful to modern man. He (Don Juan) depicted the pyramids as foreign expressions of thought and action. He said that every item, every design in them, was a calculated effort to record aspects of attention that were totally alien to us. For Don Juan, it was not only ruins of past cultures that held a dangerous element in them, anything which was the object of an obsessive concern had a harmful potential.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness349 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “Your compulsion to possess and hold on to things is not unique, he (Don Juan) said. ‘Everyone who wants to follow the warrior’s path, the sorcerer’s way, has to rid himself of this fixation.’ My benefactor told me that there was a time when warriors did have material objects on which they placed their obsession. And that gave rise to the question of whose object would be more powerful, or the most powerful of them all. Remnants of those objects still remain in the world, the leftovers of that race for power.” For a tourist to pick up such an object found in ancient ruins and take it home, can be dangerous in the extreme. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness294 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote that Don Juan said, “… the ultimate accomplishment of a warrior (seer, seeker, shaman) was joy.” Sounds like everyone’s after the same thing, the bliss of divine communion, divine partnership perhaps, with Creator and Creator’s infinite love? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness285 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said repeatedly, that life force energy flows from the divine realm to keep all of us alive at a bare minimum. Castaneda wrote that “Life force flows to us from the south, and leaves us flowing to the north.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness301 views0 answers0 votesIt’s clear that the path of the shaman, as described by Castaneda, is a quite foreign, potentially dangerous spiritual pursuit not supported by or even compatible with modern life. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer Work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the safer and easier way to eventually achieve the same goals pursued by the shamanic seers of indigenous peoples? Will a more modern, easier, and safer shamanism path emerge after the interlopers have left, and before ascension of humanity, assuming we get there?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness352 views0 answers0 votesWe understand that disconnection from the higher self within the divine realm is what allows people to stray from the divine path and, at an extreme, become a psychopath. This seems to start with the development of narcissism, which is extreme selfishness, and on to the so-called sociopath who may only have a weak conscience remaining, but a less severe state of corruption than the psychopath. Are these all sharing a common dilemma, but just on a spectrum of relative severity in consequences?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs342 views0 answers0 votesWhat percent of human beings fall within the categories of narcissist, sociopath, and psychopath according to those rough descriptions?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs340 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said previously that there is no such thing as a wasted prayer, that ALL prayers are heard and acted upon to the greatest extent allowed. However, the amount of efficacy and power will be affected by a whole host of factors, with the primary one being the belief quotient. Nevertheless, how useful to the divine is the weakest prayer ever uttered versus no prayer said at all? We ask this to try and gauge just HOW important prayer, ANY prayer, is versus no prayer?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer322 views0 answers0 votesIf an atheist were to say a prayer in a mocking and derisive fashion, would that have any value at all? Would it potentially incur a karmic liability? Is this a scenario where they would be better off not saying the prayer as opposed to saying it irreverently?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer311 views0 answers0 votesThe Rosary is one of the most said prayers in the history of humanity. In that sense, it is indeed a phenomenon worthy of exploration. The words, “Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee, blessed art thou amongst women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God …” This is three-quarters of the entire prayer, and there appears to be no action item in any of these words. However, looked at from another angle, when one says “blessed art thou” is this an action item conferring your own blessing onto Mary, adding your intention energy and thereby increasing her divine or “blessed” status? Is that even possible? And will this benefit the one praying?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer321 views0 answers0 votesWhen one sneezes and another says “bless you,” is that a genuine prayer for their benefit? Most people will utter that habitually and with little additional thought. It is also not very specific in instructing the divine to do anything in particular. Will the divine know the context in which those words were offered, and will that context play any part in determining how that prayer is utilized?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer314 views0 answers0 votesObviously, it would be better if one said when hearing a sneeze, “Source Creator, protect and heal that person from any and all conditions necessitating a sneeze response, heal any and all karmic underpinnings of any contributing condition, and keep the healing going with momentum until the healing is complete.” But of course, that would be unwieldy and quite awkward if said out loud in front of an audience of people with no understanding of the implications. We are trying to gauge the value, if any, of the typical habitual “bless you,” and what, if any, use the divine makes of it. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer342 views0 answers0 votesDoes saying a prayer out loud, have any greater power or standing than saying a prayer privately in one’s mind?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer373 views0 answers0 votesWhen saying the Rosary, one utters “Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners.” We know Creator has shared that using the word “sinners,” especially if one believes it about themselves, is disempowering. Yet, we finally have an action item in the Rosary prayer in the request to Mary to “pray for us.” We believe Mary is a wonderful divine and enlightened being. But the real question is, “Does this request, flawed as it may be, impose an “obligation” on Mary to pray for us?” I know as a physical human, if someone asks me to pray for them, I have the discretion to do so, or not to do so. Does Mary? Can another divine being help her out? Kind of like an assistant who responds to letters from fans of a famous person?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Prayer325 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola