DWQA Questions › Tag: divine wisdom
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “Use it or lose it?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
466 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “Almost everything in life is easier to get into than out of?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
438 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “No good deed goes unpunished?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
482 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “How long a minute is, depends on which side of the bathroom door you’re on?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
447 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “When all else fails, read the instructions?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
485 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “The hand will not reach for what the heart does not long for?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
454 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “Love has no age, no limit; and no death?” John Galsworthy
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
452 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing?” Socrates
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
491 views0 answers0 votes
What is the divine perspective of the saying: “The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched – they must be felt with the heart?” Helen Keller
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
449 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “This same dynamic of belonging would seem to apply to a lot of entitlement beliefs fostered by other human relationships. For example, two people agree to a business partnership to be shared “50/50.” The rational expectation is that both will be 50% responsible for making the business successful. But the reality is often that one partner will do the lion’s share, and even worse, have to actually compensate for the lack of action or even deleterious actions on the part of the other partner. Succeeding in SPITE of the other partner in fact. Yet, that deadweight partner by mere dint of the original agreement and being part of the enterprise in their head, will feel entitled to HALF, in spite of the fact they contributed nothing or next to nothing to the success of the operation, and may even be a detriment to it. We see this same dynamic often when a parent dies. A friend of mine was forced to liquidate the family sign business even though he ran it with his father for decades, was promised it in fact, but because there was a flaw in the will, the sister got half when he died, and immediately ordered its liquidation. She knew the business was promised to her brother but felt entitled to it nevertheless. Can Creator comment? Where does this unearned-yet-expected entitlement notion, which seems to be a major foundation of the evil mind, have its origin, and how is it best overcome?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
499 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is having karmic debt where this feeling of entitlement actually stems from in most cases, which appears unearned and inequitable? The entitlement is actually real, and earned, but was done so in a past life and denied, and so, therefore, is still owed and the debt consciousness actually manifests as actual expectation and entitlement emotion in people— towards people and things that outwardly appear to have no actual connection?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
454 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is wisdom rational thinking, unencumbered and unimpeded?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
460 views0 answers0 votes
Can you comment for the purpose of rounding out your comprehensive description of how to tell divine channeled wisdom from that of an imposter, in what ways my channeling through Creator, using Creator’s translator, sets my work apart from others, especially in how the message is conveyed through my voice, temperament, and vocabulary?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
416 views0 answers0 votes
Can you comment for the purpose of rounding out our comprehensive description of how to tell divine channeled wisdom from that of an imposter, whether a channeler communicating with a source speaking in a foreign language or taking on a persona with accent, idiomatic speech, and even personality characteristics matching a formerly living human is reliable evidence of authenticity?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
453 views0 answers0 votes
Because extraterrestrials can time travel, perhaps it the case that these Anunnaki psychics are mining future human works on the divine and the divine perspective, and bringing this back in time and introducing it to a humanity that’s not quite ready for it, to see what happens, to confuse, confound, and sully, and GO ON RECORD with future human understandings, diabolically adjusted BEFORE they are assembled sincerely, to cast doubt on these beliefs when in the future humans attempt to bring them forward in response to genuine understanding and inspiration. That way those who attempt to bring these truths forward down the road, can be accused of plagiarism, or of just basing their insights on Seth or Michael – and therefore discounting them before they even get started. Is this in fact what is happening?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
433 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…5758596061…63Next »
Ask Question