DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial psychopaths
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Could another name for an interloper be a “run-away ego?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
“Don’t feed the ego” is a common refrain. This implies that the ego is also hungry and actively prompts the self to be fed. Can divine intervention be used to make a client’s ego less hungry? Could divine intervention even go so far as to turn hunger into revulsion, such as people experience when they encounter a food they don’t like, or perhaps experienced food poisoning from?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
206 views0 answers0 votes
We know the interlopers, from the fallen angelics to the extraterrestrials, and even some humans, have an almost insatiable bloodlust. The bloodlust seems to be a distorted hunger of the ego. In the same way that the Lightworker Healing Protocol asks that negative energy be transformed from malevolent to benevolent, can bloodlust be similarly transformed upon request? Can the craving be divinely altered? If such cravings were reduced or transformed, would the silent voice of the long-ignored conscience have a chance to re-emerge?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
245 views0 answers0 votes
What was the reason for the recent deaths of 10,000 cattle in Kansas exposed to hot weather?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote: “Evil is in opposition to life. It is that which opposes the life force. It has, in short, to do with killing … Murder is not abstract … Evil is also what kills spirit. There are various essential attributes to life – particularly human life – such as sentience, mobility, growth, autonomy, will. It is possible to kill or attempt to kill one of these attributes without actually destroying the body. Thus we may ‘break’ a horse or even a child. … Evil, then … is that force, residing either inside or outside of human beings, that seeks to kill life or liveliness. And goodness is its opposite.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck had a teenage patient suffering from depression. His older brother had committed suicide with a 22 rifle a year earlier. For Christmas, his parents gave the patient the rifle his brother killed himself with. When Dr. Peck challenged the parents about the inappropriateness of the gift, the parents refused to acknowledge there was any problem with such a gift, claiming they were just simple, working people who can’t be expected to think like the doctor. They were not willing to examine and find fault with themselves at all. As a result, Dr. Peck diagnosed the boy’s depression as being the fault of the parents and threatened to call social services to get the boy to go live for an extended time with his aunt. He concluded the boy’s depression was actually healthy in this situation, and that the boy needed protection from his parents’ evil more than anything. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
240 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “Raised without love, children come to believe themselves unlovable. We may express this as a general law of child development: ‘Whenever there is a major deficit in parental love, the child will, in all likelihood, respond to that deficit by assuming itself to be the cause of the deficit, thereby developing an unrealistically negative self-image.’ … When a child is grossly confronted by significant evil in its parents, it will most likely misinterpret the situation and believe the evil resides in itself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
248 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… evil people, refusing to acknowledge their own failures, actually desire to project their evil onto others.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… the sicker the patients – the more dishonest in their behavior and distorted in their thinking – the less able we are to help them with any degree of success. When they are very distorted and dishonest, it seems impossible.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “The feeling that a healthy person often experiences in a relationship with an evil one is revulsion. … The feeling of revulsion can be extremely useful to a therapist. It can be a diagnostic tool par excellence. … Evil is revolting because it is dangerous. The revulsion countertransference is an instinctive or, if you will, God-given and saving early warning radar system.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
245 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… while evil people are still to be feared, they are also to be pitied. Forever fleeing from the light of self-exposure and the voice of their conscience, they are the most frightened of human beings. They live their lives in sheer terror. They need not be consigned to any hell. They are already in it.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
224 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Peck wrote, “… very few evil people are willing to be psychotherapy clients in the first place. Except under extraordinary circumstances, they will do everything possible to flee the light-shedding process of therapy. So it has been difficult for psychotherapists to get together with evil people long enough to study them or their reactions.” What this observation really tells us, is that we are literally “out of our league” when it comes to solving the problem of evil. We need “outside” assistance to solve this problem, and that assistance can come only in the form of partnership with the divine. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are truly the only tools in our toolbox we can use to truly fix the problem of evil in humanity, and even the rest of all creation?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
If football is the sports mimicry of warfare, with its plethora of military terminology and complex field strategies, professional wrestling is a mimicry of the gladiator “fight to the death” matches held during the latter days of the Roman Empire. The interlopers are always attempting to corrupt humans at every turn, so it would seem that they would rather see an actual return of deadly gladiator spectacles, rather than watered-down mimicry of them. Is this evidence of successful human resistance and human spiritual maturity as compared to Rome? Or if given enough time and desire on the part of the interlopers, would real gladiator fights to the death eventually return? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
280 views0 answers0 votes
In the 1950s the highest four paid athletes were a boxer and three wrestlers. So it’s no exaggeration to classify professional wrestling as one of the most popular mass entertainment activities of the last 70 years. Considering how little variety there actually is in the matches themselves, this is really an extraordinary phenomenon. One would think that people would eventually get bored of seeing the same thing over and over and over again. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
287 views0 answers0 votes
Talk show host Bill Maher had a number of guest wrestlers on one of his shows and everyone expressed genuine outrage when he stated the obvious, that professional wrestling wasn’t real. He also wondered out loud how healthy wrestling was for public consumption, pointing out that the solution to every problem in the wrestling world is violence. The anger this question generated on the part of the guest wrestlers was quite startling—they somehow thought the question was unfair and, of course, none of them had a good answer for it. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
242 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…1819202122…26Next »
Ask Question