Nicola Staff asked 3 months ago
There is a fundamental difference both logically and scientifically between encountering difficulty proving a viral cause for any specific circumstance or infirmity suspected of having an infectious agent as a causal origin, and dispensing with the notion altogether, that the very existence of any virus is unproven. This flies in the face of innumerable events in history showing that the idea of infection being due to something not visible to the naked eye nor visible under a light microscope is well established with ample evidence. This has not only confirmed something present with newer technologies, such as the electron microscope, but also countless experiments using Koch's postulate, that the action of an infectious agent may be suspect but not proven until it is extracted from the victim and used to demonstrate the same symptoms in another person in whom it is injected. Understandably, such experiments are not done today because of medical ethics, but have been done again and again in past eras. Many viruses are difficult to isolate and grow in quantity to conduct such experiments, even in animals, not to mention that some are only infectious in humans, or are very slow-growing and difficult to detect or re-isolate, so confirmation in the most convincing fashion proves too difficult.
Moreover, viruses are clearly life forms, and science acknowledges their lifelike properties, being that they can often be propagated in huge numbers within living tissue such as hen's eggs, cultured monkey kidney cells, and so on, which are used routinely to grow viruses for use in vaccines. This is not wishful thinking or sophistry, but a large-scale technology that has paid many dividends in recent times to eradicate, or nearly eradicate, a number of serious scourges, like smallpox and polio, which have fulfilled all of the most strict requirements validating the existence of an infectious viral agent. To this we would add our own comments that, as your channel has been informed, we did create viruses. The fact that has been perverted to alter their properties and make them more virulent and dangerous as a threat to living creatures was done by extraterrestrials possessed of advanced technologies.
The thing to keep in mind is there is a gigantic disinformation campaign that has been ongoing through history to counter science on all fronts, including the infectious disease arena and its workers, to confound and confuse things, to interfere with experiments and clinical trials, and especially to spread propaganda of all kinds through mind control manipulation. That is what has led to the idea that viruses are not real, that vaccines are entirely a danger and not ever a benefit. Such campaigns are underway constantly because they will ensnare the unwitting, who may have certain biases within their thinking already and will embrace the idea, and once it becomes an inner belief, will not be dislodged by contrary evidence. That is what programming is designed to do, to instill faulty thinking and carve it in stone so that it cannot be overridden by logic, reason, and evidence to the contrary.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
