DWQA Questions › Tag: hierarchyFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control576 views0 answers0 votesDuring the experiments, at one point Dr. Schwartz’s own mother was trying to come through and was overpowering the other dead people who were scheduled to make an appearance. This seemed to convey how little actual “control” the medium had over the channels of communication. It seemed the dead were more successful at establishing and controlling the boundaries of communication than the medium himself. Is this one of the reasons why divine partnership is so critical when one works with non-local consciousness?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control479 views0 answers0 votesAlso, during the experiments, there were a few occasions where one medium or another simply could not communicate with the dead people associated with a particular sitter. They simply got “nothing” the way most people would. Yet, a different medium would have no trouble with that sitter at all. It was summed up as the particular medium simply “wasn’t right” for that particular sitter. Yet that medium would have profound success with other sitters. Can Creator explain why this “all or nothing” anomaly occurred?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control509 views0 answers0 votesOne thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control505 views0 answers0 votesThe question of corruption is a compelling one. The mediumship on display and being tested in the experiments was “garden variety” in the sense it was focused on family and personal relationship issues more than anything, and therefore presumably of little interest to the interlopers. However, if the experiment had attempted to explore more expansive issues, such as GetWisdom explores, would extraterrestrial psychics have “jumped in” and taken over the channel much like Dr. Schwartz’s own mother did?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control490 views0 answers0 votesDr. Schwartz wrote about what he called “skeptomania” and “voodoo skepticism.” He wrote, “It’s one thing to be skeptical – open to alternative hypotheses. It’s another to be devoutly skeptical – always ‘knowing’ that cheating, lying, fraud, and deception are the explanations for any not-yet-explainable phenomena.” Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help reduce the ranks of the “devoutly skeptical?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control479 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Who are Father God and Mother God? Are they an extension of the divine, or New Age phenomena (if the latter, who are they referring to)?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Realm517 views0 answers0 votesThe viewer continues: “Sylvia Browne talked at great lengths about Father God and Mother God. She also described Heaven in much detail: Hall of Wisdom, Hall of Justice, Hall of Records, Hall of Research, Temple of Learning, the Temple of Mother God (Azna), the Temple of Father God, and more. She also delved into the topics of death and transition, describing the Other Side, our activities once there, the Council of Elders, and so on. Did Sylvia Browne truly connect with the divine realm, or was she influenced by interlopers?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Realm660 views0 answers0 votesThe viewer continues: “Is the Heaven Sylvia Browne talked about a dimension of the higher astral?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Realm524 views0 answers0 votesThe viewer continues: “Was Sylvia Browne divinely inspired or deceived? To what extent were her teachings accurate?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Realm546 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com has this as one of its definitions of arrogance: “The definition of arrogant is someone who is full of self-worth or self-importance and who tells and shows that they have a feeling of superiority over others.” Such individuals seem spoiled by success. Why is this such a common fault? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs555 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com also has this to define arrogance: “Having excessive pride in oneself, often with contempt for others.” From this definition, we can glean that arrogance is not synonymous with pride, but with excessive pride that corrupts the person. Why does excessive pride become a toxic and corrosive influence? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs416 views0 answers0 votesThe common assumption is that arrogance is really a cover for deep inner insecurity and doubt about one’s standing, value, and capabilities. So this implies that not all of the arrogant fully believe their own exaggerated self-appraisal. Are some of the arrogant self-aware of their arrogance, while others are genuinely clueless? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs482 views0 answers0 votesWe know that arrogance is a huge problem for beings in the physical, especially when cut off from intuitive feedback from others. But it seems that arrogance is also a problem for light beings, as exemplified by the fall of Lucifer and his cohorts. In the light, it would seem arrogance poses a problem because nothing is hidden. If light beings are aware of the thoughts of those around them they would know immediately if someone is out of alignment. Can such naked exposure to the assessment of others produce both humbling and incendiary effects? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs429 views0 answers0 votesThe essence of enlightenment is to be fully in alignment with the divine. It seems arrogance of any kind would be a good indicator of how far away or close one is in terms of divine alignment. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs469 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola