DWQA Questions › Tag: nonbelieversFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA lot of folks have an idea of what is meant by the word “Ascension.” Google’s dictionary definition of the word is: “the act of rising to an important position or a higher level.” That seems to fit well with Creator’s disclosures about the nature and even purpose of the ascension. But clearly that is just a starting point. Can Creator give us a definition of “ascension” that we can competently and coherently use to inform someone completely new to the concept?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential350 views0 answers0 votesClearly, ascension is more, much more, than just climbing the stairs or riding the elevator from one floor to another in a cookie-cutter office building. It sounds more like a transformation, a radical change of state more akin to a caterpillar transforming into a butterfly. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential358 views0 answers0 votesWe know it’s not just humanity that ascends, but Earth itself, and us along for the ride. Is this an unprecedented thing for a planet to do, or have other planets done this in the Milky Way Galaxy’s past, or in past iterations of the universe? We know solving the problem of evil once and for all is an unprecedented event, but that seems like an entirely separate agenda not inextricably tied to the process of planetary and species ascension, or is it? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential341 views0 answers0 votesWhen people think of heaven, it’s easy to think of it as one destination, but isn’t that ridiculously simplistic? That would be like thinking, when you die you go to Europe. But Europe is a BIG place with lots of variety. When you die do you go to England, France, or Romania? If you go to France, do you go to Paris or Marseilles? We’ve been told there are different “levels” to heaven. When Earth ascends, does it ascend to heaven, and if the answer is a qualified “yes,” can Creator explain that “yes” in more detail?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential450 views0 answers0 votesWe’ve been told about the Divine Rules of Engagement in great detail since Karl began conversing with Archangels. But we’re of the understanding that an “Ascended Earth” and an “Ascended Humanity” will come into possession of, and be able to engage the universe with, a NEW set of rules of engagement. Can Creator give us a breakdown of the major differences if this is indeed the case?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential350 views0 answers0 votesWhen certain biblical figures ascended, as reported in the Bible, they were reported to ascend FULLY in their physical bodies. That said, the Catholic Church makes a distinction between what happened with Mary, the Mother of Jesus, and what happened with Jesus. From Google, quote, “The main difference between ascension and assumption is that Jesus ascended into the Kingdom of Heaven by His own power while Mary’s assumption depended on the power of God.” Is this true? And if it is, what lessons should we draw from this distinction?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential385 views0 answers0 votesIn the King James Bible, Acts 1:10-11, it says, “And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.” This was reportedly 40 days after his resurrection. It’s assumed the men in white apparel were angels or other divine figures. Since Creator has told us there will not be a second coming of Christ for numerous reasons, what meaning can we ascribe to the words of these divine figures to the disciples?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential373 views0 answers0 votesWhen the Earth ascends along with humanity living in the physical upon her at the time, will it be an ascension like Jesus, “under his own power,” or more like an “assumption,” “depending on the power of God?” Will the experience be similar for everyone directly involved, or will it vary wildly based on multiple factors? Will it be blissful for all, or only for some? Will it be pleasurable or painful, or will that vary as well? Will it be “fatal” for any, having them end up in limbo rather than making it to “the Other Side?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential343 views0 answers0 votesWe have been told that mosquitos will not ascend and be resident on an ascended Earth. Why is that, and how is that determined? Are they selected out by Divine will, Earth’s will, ascended humanity’s will, or will their particular vibration simply prevent them from ascending, and so the ascension is a fatal event for them? Of all the millions of species on Earth, what percentage of them will ascend successfully? And, of course, creation is never finished, so it is assumed the door is open for new species to appear in ascended Earth’s future. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential351 views0 answers0 votesWe have been told repeatedly that the ascension will not occur for either Earth or humanity until both are sufficiently healed of their traumatic karmic legacy. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the only means now available to assure the ascension takes place, and on a timely basis?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential311 views0 answers0 votesOAHSPE: A New Bible, is a channeled, via automatic writing, 890-page work by American dentist John Ballou Newbrough, published in 1882. The resulting religion is known as “Faithism.” What can Creator tell us about Newbrough, this channeled book, and “Faithism?” Is it worth investigating further?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls493 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The Urantia Book is an influential book about spirituality and the divine. Is the information contained in it 100% accurate? If not, what percentage of it is false? Could you extract or sum up to us, from the 196 papers of The Urantia Book, all true information that is constructive for our spiritual growth and knowledge? If possible, can you direct us on what papers to read?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls566 views0 answers0 votesThe practice, for many years, of religious institutions housing nuns, monks, priests, and other devout religious people to live lives focused on prayer has been seen by some as a kind of limited, even selfish, devotion that does little good for the world. Was there, in actuality, a divine plan behind that, to create much prayerful human intention that could be repurposed in the future, once people understood that was possible? Is all that prayer now being amplified to further empower the Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions practitioners are launching to save and heal humanity, and which pool human intention as fuel?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Religions350 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “String theory has forced physics, as a branch of science, to explore that the underlying nature of reality consists of vibration. It has mathematically proven reliable and useful in the field of quantum physics. Is string theory accurate, as far as it goes, and can it unseat materialism with wider acceptance in the scientific community and create a bridge to the divine realm?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Physical Universe510 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Even materialist scientists admit that string theory is mathematically valid. However, they insist that it is not accurate as an explanation of the nature of reality because it shatters the idea that the universe only has three dimensions. Is it not the dogmatic belief about a materialistic, 3-dimensional universe that these individuals hold that is the actual problem, rather than string theory?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Physical Universe462 views0 answers0 votes