DWQA Questions › Tag: egoFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSutphen, additionally, said this about Carnegie techniques, “If you use Carnegie techniques to win friends, the friendship has to be based upon a two-way manipulation. You pretend to be the mask to attain friendship and they will be your friend as long as you wear it. What happens when your mask slips and they find out who you really are? Do you need any relationship or association so badly that you’re willing to repress your real self in order to attain it?” Many would answer YES – they have a mortgage to pay, and must wear the mask in order to stay employed. Sutphen was an independent businessman and had more freedom in that regard. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Guidance567 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote that in his opinion, it was possible to “lie with the truth.” He cited as an example a man who came to him plagued with guilt about an illicit affair he had some 20 years earlier. His wife never learned of it and was still ignorant of it when he sought Frankl’s advice. Dr. Frankl implored him NOT to tell her. His reason for doing so was because he believed that the man truly loved his wife and had no desire to traumatize her. Based on what he knew of the man’s wife, he was convinced that there was little to no chance of the wife receiving the news without drawing the false conclusion that he did not love her, and consequently would not be able to forgive him. So he attempted to coach the man, that telling her the truth, would be akin to lying, for it would encourage her to believe a lie—that her husband did not ever love her. The man ignored Frankl’s advice, and the result was an ugly divorce with both parties deeply emotionally traumatized. Was Frankl right? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Guidance605 views0 answers0 votesDick Sutphen in his book, Radical Spirituality, listed 69 reminders and asserted they were the only Bible anyone needed. Number 50 was, “Refuse to make choice based upon the expectations of others. Instead, act in ways consistent with your purpose.” Out of the 69 reminders, this one, if followed uncritically, could cause a great deal of trouble for a person in this world. Sometimes, not telling someone, like an authority figure, what they want or expect to hear, could be quite problematic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Guidance495 views0 answers0 votes“Informed consent” is obviously important to most people, and a fundamentally fair way to manage human affairs. Yet, in the realm of remote healing, it is possible to heal or attempt to heal someone without their knowledge, which would render moot any notion of their consent. Isn’t that dishonest? Can Creator tell us if Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are exempt from that concern, and if so, why?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divine Guidance577 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Considering that most all the extraterrestrials in the Alliance have found ways to extend their lives, are they all fit and attractive, from their perspective? As being ego-based, I imagine vanity is largely universal for the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Or are there overweight, unattractive, and/or disabled ETs, maybe of a lower caste found in their respective societies?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers466 views0 answers0 votesIs the Anunnaki race billions of years old?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers531 views0 answers0 votesPresident Joe Biden’s press conference after his first year in office, which was only his second one held, seemed quite strange. His unruffled demeanor and supreme confidence, and seeming boastfulness about the greatness of his achievements, including the claim he has had the most successful first year of any U.S. President, seemed excessive. Is this just an act, a consequence of having a large ego, is his judgment compromised, or is there something more sinister going on?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control558 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com has this as one of its definitions of arrogance: “The definition of arrogant is someone who is full of self-worth or self-importance and who tells and shows that they have a feeling of superiority over others.” Such individuals seem spoiled by success. Why is this such a common fault? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs567 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com also has this to define arrogance: “Having excessive pride in oneself, often with contempt for others.” From this definition, we can glean that arrogance is not synonymous with pride, but with excessive pride that corrupts the person. Why does excessive pride become a toxic and corrosive influence? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs429 views0 answers0 votesThe common assumption is that arrogance is really a cover for deep inner insecurity and doubt about one’s standing, value, and capabilities. So this implies that not all of the arrogant fully believe their own exaggerated self-appraisal. Are some of the arrogant self-aware of their arrogance, while others are genuinely clueless? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs493 views0 answers0 votesWe know that arrogance is a huge problem for beings in the physical, especially when cut off from intuitive feedback from others. But it seems that arrogance is also a problem for light beings, as exemplified by the fall of Lucifer and his cohorts. In the light, it would seem arrogance poses a problem because nothing is hidden. If light beings are aware of the thoughts of those around them they would know immediately if someone is out of alignment. Can such naked exposure to the assessment of others produce both humbling and incendiary effects? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs442 views0 answers0 votesThe essence of enlightenment is to be fully in alignment with the divine. It seems arrogance of any kind would be a good indicator of how far away or close one is in terms of divine alignment. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs487 views0 answers0 votesSetbacks for the arrogant appear to either induce humility, or rage, perhaps even a complex mix of the two. Resulting rage can be targeted at the self, others, or both. What is it about rage that can overwhelm humility, and even eventually extinguish it all together?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs542 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that humility is in fact a striving for excellence, while rage is a striving for revenge. The lust for power seems to be a desire to give everyone a successful comeuppance—except for the self. Unchecked, it seems rage begets more and more rage until the mind is filled with nothing else. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs484 views0 answers0 votesThe size of a setback can have a significant bearing on whether the result is humility or rage. For instance, a parking ticket legitimately earned, even if unintentionally, is likely to result in humility. But if the car is towed, impounded, and quickly sold at auction the next day by corrupt officials, the result is not likely to be “humility.” Some setbacks are karmic, but others are first offenses or unearned and undeserved insults. Humility seems to have the deck stacked against it in these situations. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs452 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola