DWQA Questions › Tag: karmic consequencesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAssuming one like Emperor Darth Sidious can never return to divine alignment so long as there is no “conflict” in his being, is it the goal of divine healing to reintroduce that very “conflict?” To reignite the potential for “good” in the depraved being, and offer them a way out? Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can save even the most depraved of the fallen?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers268 views0 answers0 votesA client asked us to check on a woman who committed suicide by jumping in front of a commuter train seven years ago, and we found she was still earthbound and not in the light. Some believe suicide is a mortal sin. Can you help us understand what led to her death and her failure to transition fully?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Transition (Crossing Over)533 views0 answers0 votesRichard Rogers said: “The Athenians had an oath for someone who was about to become a citizen. They had to swear that ‘I shall leave the city not less but more beautiful than I found it.'” This would be considered a positive oath. What is Creator’s perspective, and is this oath truly benign?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma405 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “… a man who belongs to a given nation is obviously neither guilty nor meritorious by that fact alone. His guilt would begin when, for example, he did not cultivate in himself the special talents of the nation, or took no part in national cultural values; while he would be acting meritoriously if he overcame in himself certain characterological weaknesses of the nation by a conscious process of self-examination.” Frankl’s perspective is quite thought provoking when it is understood that some of the most common oaths sworn today are to the nations that people live in. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma319 views0 answers0 votesNorman Douglas said: “Never take a solemn oath. People might think you mean it.” This would be especially true if it was a “witnessed” event. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma360 views0 answers0 votesDr. Viktor Frankl wrote: “Every one of us knows somehow that the content of his life is somehow preserved and saved.” If the taking of an oath is an affirmative deed that becomes recorded for all of time in the akashic records, one can never get away from it completely, and at the very least, the event will always be in the recorded history of the soul. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma442 views0 answers0 votesThe most pernicious form of oath is the loyalty oath accompanied by a requirement to carry out a nefarious deed, such as killing another human being. Some people consider this urban myth and don’t want to believe that this actually happens. However, a recent local story about a random shooting was published in Grand Rapids, Michigan. For the story, the reporter consulted with a former Chicago gang member for his analysis. The consultant says to join the gang the shooter was suspected of trying to join, a person must kill a rival gang member or someone random. But the rules are they can’t get caught. What can Creator tell us? Is this an urban myth? And if not, how widespread a problem is it?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma338 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that the power of an oath depends on how successfully it alters and/or cements belief. Is it correct to say it’s not the oath itself that binds, but the effect it has on the beliefs of oath takers, oath administrators, and oath witnesses?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma312 views0 answers0 votesGeorge Washington said: “Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma343 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on the American “Pledge of Allegiance?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma379 views0 answers0 votesSamuel Coleridge Taylor said: “The present system of taking oaths is horrible. It is awfully absurd to make a man invoke God’s wrath upon himself, if he speaks false; it is, in my judgment, a sin to do so.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma353 views0 answers0 votesThe Lightworker Healing Protocol expressly lists “oaths” as a spiritual reality requiring healing intervention. Can Creator summarize why this is so, and how Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol are the most effective means to reverse the damage to the soul they can do?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Karma314 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com has this as one of its definitions of arrogance: “The definition of arrogant is someone who is full of self-worth or self-importance and who tells and shows that they have a feeling of superiority over others.” Such individuals seem spoiled by success. Why is this such a common fault? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs353 views0 answers0 votesYourdictionary.com also has this to define arrogance: “Having excessive pride in oneself, often with contempt for others.” From this definition, we can glean that arrogance is not synonymous with pride, but with excessive pride that corrupts the person. Why does excessive pride become a toxic and corrosive influence? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs276 views0 answers0 votesThe common assumption is that arrogance is really a cover for deep inner insecurity and doubt about one’s standing, value, and capabilities. So this implies that not all of the arrogant fully believe their own exaggerated self-appraisal. Are some of the arrogant self-aware of their arrogance, while others are genuinely clueless? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs313 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola