DWQA QuestionsCategory: Coronavirus COVID-19The vaccines against COVID-19 are now known to be less perfect in preventing infection than at first thought. You told us at the beginning of the pandemic that this virus would be a challenge to vaccine-makers, but wouldn’t discount “human ingenuity.” Has the degree of success achieved been due as well to divine intervention to inspire the scientific approach being used that is at least partially effective in keeping most people symptom-free even if they become infected?
Nicola Staff asked 2 years ago
Little gets past your intuitive reach these days. You are seeing this quite accurately, that it is not solely human ingenuity, but an actual partnership with the divine taking place. This is truly an answer to prayers, more so than the standing and reach of the scientists involved, although their interest in helping humanity is truly heartfelt. So this is in alignment with us bringing some assistance in the form of inspiration their way, to help guide them to an optimum approach. This is a success in terms of hastening the timeline in avoiding pursuing a false lead, or two, or three, before streamlining things and using the ideal strategy. That is what enabled this so-called "Trump triumph" in shortening and telescoping the timeline for successful vaccine production from years to months. But it was not Trump’s doing, it was a divine intervention wanting to address the growing chorus of people fearing the pandemic under way and being terrified of all that could do to their hopes and dreams and future for themselves and their loved ones. So you have this pegged right, that we were being cautious at the outset because we knew there would be some limitations even with an optimal strategy for a quick solution, so to speak. And that is what has made the difference here to enable things to move forward very quickly, which was sorely needed given the prospects for a worldwide pandemic with a virus that has killing potential inherent in its makeup. As we have shared with you, the vaccine has enabled reducing severity of the illness and this is now commonly known and established by the medical establishment through the observations that those vaccinated require significantly less hospitalization and the mortality is exceedingly low. This augmentation due to the vaccine is piggybacked on top of an overall intervention on behalf of humanity by the divine realm. But even with our intervention on behalf of humanity, the vaccine is a great blessing because it reduces the size of the problem by a physical means alone, so we do not have to do all of the heavy lifting. People will be less susceptible, especially to the severe and life-threatening complications, if their immune system is primed enough to keep the infection level down to a manageable degree. As a result, many who become infected remain symptom-free totally, or have fleeting and mild symptoms only, and that is a great benefit. It is easier to forestall signs of infection when the body is ramped up to take on the problem in a natural way and do much of what is needed to keep things in check. So the divine healing can bridge the gap more easily than if it were needed to totally solve the dilemma of someone stricken with illness, and heavily infected before they might turn to us for help. The vaccines are not harmless, but this is true of all vaccines because they are an insult to the body by definition as an inherent part of the strategy. That is what triggers the immune system to develop some degree of immunity to some aspect of the infectious organism. That can never be done without some risk. But on the whole, the vaccine has been far more helpful than harmful, and that is often the best one can do using human technology. This is why we have not been negative about vaccines categorically, and have carefully explained that, while not perfect, and even though they will harm some and may result in some deaths as well, those greater vulnerabilities are due to those victims being so sensitive to the spike protein of the virus. They would likely have succumbed even more quickly, if they became infected with Covid-19, when the exposure to the spike protein would be more massive and dangerous. So it is not a contaminant of the vaccine or an ill-considered and faulty strategy in the implementation through using a genetic production within the cells of the body to create and release the viral spike protein. It is a safer strategy than using an attenuated but live virus or even a killed virus. There are many instances of such things resulting in outbreaks due to manufacturing errors and so on. The propagation of live virus also entails risky tissue culture environments that are contaminated with other viruses and the vaccine then becomes a vector for other potential pathogens. Even though it might be protecting against the intended target, it will infect people with another scourge and this has resulted in severe problems for many, as you are aware. So, on balance, we judge the vaccine program a success and an asset benefiting human progress based on the information now available.