This was not Oswald, but another individual. So the photo presents what is, in effect, a red herring, to be a source of controversy. As you know, that helps the interlopers. The more divergent witness accounts, testimonies, and affidavits that can be generated, the more it calls into question any particular testimony. This leaves people concluding that eyewitness testimony simply cannot be relied on, similar to photographs that lack high-enough resolution to be unequivocal in making an identification.
Please login or Register to submit your answer