DWQA Questions › Tag: archangels
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
One thing notably absent from the experiments was the entire notion of reincarnation. Nor was there any distinction made, or awareness of different states or conditions the dead might be communicating from. We know that one of three who die end up in limbo. Yet all the dead communicating appeared to be doing so from the same “place.” What was the reality of the dead in that set of experiments? Were all in the light? If so, were rescues performed for some prior to the experiments, and if so, by whom? Did the experiment itself act as a kind of “rescue entreaty” that enabled the divine to step in and “set the table” ahead of time? Or, indeed, were some in the light and some in limbo, even though there was no indication of such status during the experiments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
464 views0 answers0 votes
The question of corruption is a compelling one. The mediumship on display and being tested in the experiments was “garden variety” in the sense it was focused on family and personal relationship issues more than anything, and therefore presumably of little interest to the interlopers. However, if the experiment had attempted to explore more expansive issues, such as GetWisdom explores, would extraterrestrial psychics have “jumped in” and taken over the channel much like Dr. Schwartz’s own mother did?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
460 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Schwartz wrote about what he called “skeptomania” and “voodoo skepticism.” He wrote, “It’s one thing to be skeptical – open to alternative hypotheses. It’s another to be devoutly skeptical – always ‘knowing’ that cheating, lying, fraud, and deception are the explanations for any not-yet-explainable phenomena.” Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help reduce the ranks of the “devoutly skeptical?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
434 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous channeling on Lucifer, Creator said the following: “So this well known risk of power, that ‘Absolute power corrupts absolutely,’ has applied once again in the story of Lucifer. This need not be so, but if not guarded against is a trap for the unwary.” You explained the major risk of great power as being too great a reward for the ego, causing one to become too self-serving. What then is needed to prevent that?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
583 views0 answers0 votes
For the benefit of our better understanding, and with all due respect to you as the being with absolute power in the universe, how does Creator avoid corruption, if absolute power corrupts absolutely?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
660 views0 answers0 votes
In a previous channeling on Lucifer, Creator said, “In the particular universe you find yourselves at the moment, things were more successful than the prior iteration.” Can Creator elaborate on that statement? The current universe is estimated to be about 14.5 billion years old. Where on that timeline did the so-called “War in Heaven” start to become a serious problem? Was there karmic baggage from previous universes that played a role to trigger and help to fuel the current dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
742 views0 answers0 votes
We know from Creator, that Karl earned greater access to the divine while in this physical incarnation, on account of his service and success in his previous life as Allan Kardec. Can we safely assume that Lucifer attained his role in a similar fashion, as stated previously by Creator, that “Lucifer was an archangel of the highest order and was entrusted with dominion over the angelics within the Milky Way Galaxy as a whole?” Can Creator share with us more of Lucifer’s “resume” that earned him the trust to have “dominion over the angelics?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
584 views0 answers0 votes
Another question arises from this statement by Creator: “So this well-known risk of power, that ‘Absolute power corrupts absolutely,’ has applied once again in the story of Lucifer. This need not be so, but if not guarded against is a trap for the unwary.” This seems to be a bit of a paradoxical conundrum. On the one hand, Creator is saying “if not guarded against” followed by “trap for the unwary.” The word “unwary” implies ignorance, a critical lack of experience with negative consequences, and failure to take precautions. Is this essentially what happened to Lucifer? Was he a victim of his own prior successes—too much success, and not enough failure to truly instill in him the wisdom and forbearance needed to avoid catastrophe?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
559 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator further comment on the hazards of too much success, too quickly? Is the only true cure for a critical lack of experience, more experience? Humans, in particular, have a tendency to reward the successful with even more responsibility and access and control of resources. There is also the time-worn caveat of people rising to the level of their incompetence. The ultra-successful have the added danger of getting there faster and, as a result, not just reaching the level of their incompetence, but over-shooting it by a wide margin—finding themselves in a situation where they are not only incompetent but grossly so. Is this also a fair characterization of what happened to Lucifer?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
566 views0 answers0 votes
How much does Creator have to actively manage the expectations of light beings? Was there a consensus about Lucifer’s readiness for greater power that Creator felt the need to support? Is the divine prone to reward success with more responsibility, even when there is concern about the poverty of true wisdom as a result of uneven development? Did Creator feel duty-bound to reward the successful Lucifer, knowing the extreme hazards awaiting him, and his potential inability to cope with them?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
533 views0 answers0 votes
Could Creator have said about Lucifer, “I told you so,” and not to just Lucifer himself, but to all those who eagerly supported his attaining a position of power? Was Creator surprised by the outcome? Did Creator earlier regard the possibility of Lucifer’s extreme fall into depravity as likely, or remote?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
584 views0 answers0 votes
As Lucifer was a veteran of earlier universes, he must surely have witnessed a similar “fall from grace” and descent into depravity. Did he think he was immune, that it could never happen to him? And that no amount of warnings could change that self-perception, as evidenced by this earlier channeling of Creator: “This led to the misapplication of power and inner corruption of his thinking and worsened over time despite hints and warnings he was taking liberties that were inadvisable but proceeded anyway. This led to his downfall.” We are reminded of teenagers, in particular, who ignore their parent’s advice, and then promptly go out and get themselves in grave trouble. Are we on the right track in trying to understand what happened and why?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
554 views0 answers0 votes
Flash floods are dangerous, and one should never stand in running water that’s rising. At some point, you will have waited too long to escape, and once that point is passed, you will be carried away against your own will, no longer possessing any ability to rescue yourself. You will now need the intercession of others. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol enable us humans to intercede, and even potentially rescue Lucifer and the fallen angelics, and that it is up to us, and not just Creator and the divine realm?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
578 views0 answers0 votes
The Farsight Institute recently did a large remote viewing project on Lucifer. The Farsight Institute is an organization doing publicly accessible remote viewing based on military-developed protocols. An interesting point of distinction is their emphasis on recruiting young and diverse remote viewers. Knowing the influx of Indigo Children, it appears that most if not all of these young viewers (20-somethings at most) are indeed profoundly intuitive. What is Creator’s perspective on The Farsight Institute and its young, talented slate of remote viewers?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
595 views0 answers0 votes
We know that more than 90% of channelers are not channeling who they intend to channel. We also know that any intuitive outreach is potentially risky, both in terms of the veracity of the information received, as well as to the physical and spiritual well-being of the channeler. The Farsight Institute uses a military protocol and therefore does not reveal the target of the viewing prior to the remote viewing session. Does this ignorance on the part of the remote viewer provide any protection at all against interloper intrusion? Does it provide the intended protection against preconceived notions on the part of the remote viewer? If they are not getting adequate divine protection for their work, can that protection be provided, at least to some degree, by GetWisdom Lightworker Healing Protocol practitioners for these remote viewers as they do their work?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
482 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456Next »
Ask Question