DWQA QuestionsCategory: Extraterrestrial InterlopersWe know that more than 90% of channelers are not channeling who they intend to channel. We also know that any intuitive outreach is potentially risky, both in terms of the veracity of the information received, as well as to the physical and spiritual well-being of the channeler. The Farsight Institute uses a military protocol and therefore does not reveal the target of the viewing prior to the remote viewing session. Does this ignorance on the part of the remote viewer provide any protection at all against interloper intrusion? Does it provide the intended protection against preconceived notions on the part of the remote viewer? If they are not getting adequate divine protection for their work, can that protection be provided, at least to some degree, by GetWisdom Lightworker Healing Protocol practitioners for these remote viewers as they do their work?
Nicola Staff asked 2 years ago
Ignorance may be bliss in some circumstances but it is no protection from danger, and rather the opposite, the danger is in reaching out with the intuitive awareness without prior requests for protection to be shielded from outside observation and whatever might follow. So it is reaching out, for whatever purpose, that will get them noticed and put them at risk. The target of the moment has nothing to do with the fact they are beaming their consciousness out into the ether, much as someone beaming a flashlight into the heavens in the dark of night wanting to see something but, in turn, will be visible themselves and can be tracked back to the origin and manipulated as a consequence. Their lack of preknowledge about the intended target is helpful in providing freedom from bias and preconceived notions of what one might find or what a target might look like. This is particularly useful, as the subconscious mind that is interacting with the intuitive apparatus has creative potential and will often tend to fill in gaps based on its own knowledge, simply trying to be helpful. It is a more primitive part of the mind and may well introduce some distortion if pressured, so conducting an intuitive survey without a preconceived agenda has some merit because it will leave the person uninhibited and allow them to be calm and focused, in an inquisitive mode, and presumably open to whatever might be detectable. There is a downside, which is that beyond the prosaic level of the physical it may be harder to see those things that are more hidden because they are in other dimensions, or have properties involving interaction with more than one dimension, and so on. But those can be included in a general guideline to inspect, essentially do a broad scan for a wide array of things that might be detectable, and this allows the intuitive the benefit of knowing they may need to do repeated scans of the same target location but on different frequencies, so to speak, to look for a variety of possible manifestations. Intuition is open-ended but it is always a function of what is being projected by the intention of the observer, so this strategy is a very mixed one because in preventing inner bias and not knowing or understanding the purpose for a viewing mission, the intuitive will not be able to function optimally in focusing and fine‑tuning the intuitive reach to have the greatest likelihood of perceiving all that might be present. The risks for them can be alleviated if there are practitioners of the Lightworker Healing Protocol including them as clients, but this will be true only up to a point. In effect, those practitioners are loaning their desire for safety to those individuals who are operating in ignorance. This will be difficult to maintain because those remote viewers will be launching sessions again and again and again from their own intentions to reach out without safeguards, and there may be limits to how thoroughly the divine realm can protect them when they themselves are being reckless, so it is of benefit but not a guarantee the remote viewers will be protected on a consistent basis.