495 views0 answers0 votes
584 views0 answers0 votes
I was reviewing a recently published virology text and saw their discussion of the continuing controversy about whether viruses, despite having some characteristics of life forms, are actually alive. They acknowledge this is an important question for biologists because “a universally accepted definition for life does not exist.” Science, of course, has no idea that viruses possess consciousness, and, indeed, the issue of whether consciousness is present in life forms other than human beings is seriously debated. And even human consciousness is dismissed by some prominent scientists as being just a secondary consequence of brain chemical and electrical activity and perhaps just a “lucky accident” of evolution, more a fluke than a driving force. Are these views really the reverse of reality? Is the existence and expression of consciousness a universal property that defines whether something is alive? Is fundamental “life force energy” coming from the higher spiritual plane, which gives the spark of life, a special form of consciousness?597 views0 answers0 votes
612 views0 answers0 votes
428 views0 answers0 votes
370 views0 answers0 votes
373 views0 answers0 votes
437 views0 answers0 votes
404 views0 answers0 votes
451 views0 answers0 votes
415 views0 answers0 votes
561 views0 answers0 votes
512 views0 answers0 votes
520 views0 answers0 votes
524 views0 answers0 votes