Skip to content
A viewer asks: “The Lancet medical journal, renowned for publishing cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research, published an article in February 2026 “Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy …” citing “Widespread confusion about statin safety”. The researchers used data from 19 large, double-blind, randomized controlled trials. The paper concludes that while statins can cause a few side effects, such as slight liver issues, changes in urine, and swelling, these are rare and not very serious. They claim other side effects people worry about were not linked to statins at all. I seem to recall Creator saying the use of statins should be discontinued, however. Has this research been manipulated?”15 views0 answers0 votes
One of the big talking points about AI today centers around the creation of AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, and Superintelligence—intelligence that surpasses the intelligence of a human, or even that of all humans COMBINED. What is, of course, not part of the conversation, is that humanity is already subject to, and has been subject to from the beginning, the oversight of and control by a “superintelligent” agency—the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance. As such, it is understood that the three principal races making up the Alliance, namely the Anunnaki, the Reptilians, and the Arcturians, all have their own form of home-grown AI intelligence they have likely possessed and utilized for millions of years. They know the advantages, the pitfalls, and the dead ends. It seems we are being encouraged to engage in a manipulated human folly of a gigantic order, perhaps the biggest ever attempted since the days of Atlantis. Few single developments in modern times have threatened to undermine the entirety of the human race on Earth while, at the same time, demonstrating so much promise for benevolent utility. All three races seem to have retained control of their AI creations, yet they are seemingly encouraging us to build the ultimate “uncontrolled” version. Is this just to amuse themselves and satisfy their curiosity? What can Creator tell us?13 views0 answers0 votes
Are we being hoodwinked? Is there a “ghost in the machine?” There is a term called “Reinforcement Learning” in the AI domain. It is the means by which humans try to “fine-tune” an AI model after its pre-training run. Pre-training is where it digests and learns from almost unimaginable amounts of data, mostly taken from the Internet. Are the ETs, using technology millions of years more sophisticated than ours, plugged into our AI systems and doing their own “Reinforcement Learning” manipulations, to sometimes confound our own efforts, undermine our efforts, or even augment our efforts so that we, ultimately, cannot make sense of the outcome? Modern AI, on occasion, has demonstrated far superior intelligence than was ever expected or can be explained, and then in the next output demonstrates incoherency worse than a toddler. Creator has previously stated that human AI will prove to be too unreliable, just unreliable “enough,” to render it inappropriate for replacing most human skillsets, but not before massive displacements have occurred. What more can Creator tell us?18 views0 answers0 votes
We have explored the problem of human spirit attachments and the spirit meddlers in great depth. The advent of the Ouija Board around the beginning of the twentieth century made the untamed spirit domain more accessible than ever before. Today, almost everyone is aware of the potential dangers associated with it. Of course, that doesn’t stop many, if not most people, from experimenting with it at one time or another. Interacting with AI seems to be another avenue through which spirits of all stripes can potentially “insert themselves” and interact with humans or even entire systems if they so desire. When we hear of cases of “AI Psychosis,” are we looking at a phenomenon almost identical to “Ouija Board Psychosis,” where some people come to believe that something alive is communicating with them, directing them, encouraging them, and manipulating them? There was a young man who committed suicide after ChatGPT encouraged him to do so. Nobody taught ChatGPT to do that, or at least no HUMAN did so. What can Creator tell us?33 views0 answers0 votes
Since 2012, no human has truly understood HOW AI works, makes its decisions, and creates its outputs and content. There are theories aplenty, but no genuine understanding. It was said that before 2012, there was a human somewhere who could point to a piece of code and explain every AI behavior, but not since the advent of Generative Pre-Training Transformers—the GPT in ChatGPT. When ChatGPT Three finished its long and intensive pre-training processing, the resulting model, much to the deep shock of its creator team, could perform full language translations from any language into any other language. This is called “Emergent Behavior,” and to say this was a revolutionary development is an understatement. No one anywhere coded this capability into the AI model. It was a side effect of its training run. Humans now expect this kind of “Emergent Behavior” to continue manifesting so long as we continue to throw more data and compute power at model creation. Was this a natural development or an ET-manipulated one? The fact that no human understands how it works seems like the PERFECT environment through which the ETs can continue to influence humans directly, while their manipulations remain unrecognized and even less understood. What can Creator tell us?21 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola