Skip to content
The widespread narrative is, of course, that the Romans crucified an innocent man. But innocent of what? Because, if anything, Jesus was extraordinarily politically incorrect. Dr. Pagels wrote, “The astonished crowds recognize that Jesus possesses a special authority, direct access to God’s power. … the scribes immediately took offense at what they considered his usurpation of divine authority. By pronouncing forgiveness, Jesus claims the right to speak for God – a claim that, Mark says, angers the scribes: ‘Why does this man speak this way? It is blasphemy! Who can forgive sins but God alone? Instead of fasting, like other devout Jews, Jesus ate and drank freely. And instead of scrupulously observing Sabbath laws, Jesus excused his disciples when they broke them. Claiming divine and royal power while simultaneously violating the purity laws, Jesus, at the beginning of his public activity, outrages virtually every party among his contemporaries, from the disciples of John the Baptist to the scribes and Pharisees.'” We are faced with the conundrum of Jesus “speaking truth to power.” The hazards of which are so visibly and starkly apparent from human history, that his eventual crucifixion was not only NOT a surprise but, in fact, an almost near certainty. Anyone wishing to follow his example and engage in speaking “truth to power,” as he did, is not likely to avoid a similar life-threatening fate. What lessons are we to best derive from this? What is Creator’s perspective?5 views0 answers0 votes
What was the interloper perspective on Jesus and his ministry prior to his crucifixion? Is it to be assumed, like so much of the workings of the divine, that the actual spiritual, energetic, and miraculous workings performed by Jesus during his ministry were largely shielded from extraterrestrial observation? Is it true that all they saw was the aftermath of the miracles and not their actual mechanics? What did they, in fact, observe, and what were their evaluation and analytic conclusions regarding them? Was he a conundrum to them or, in their arrogance, did they just dismiss him without looking deeper? Was their engineering his path to crucifixion done with more urgency and determination than applied to other human victims throughout history? Or did they consider him utterly unextraordinary and had him crucified simply because they love giving a comeuppance to any human who stands out without their assistance and approval? What can Creator tell us about the interloper perspective on Jesus, both then and now?5 views0 answers0 votes
Since Jesus was “born without sin” or, as Creator has previously described it, “born with a reprieve” or disconnection from his own negative personal karmic legacy, can it be assumed that he therefore had full access to both his higher self (the “Christ self” perhaps) as well as his deep subconscious, both of which are largely cut off from direct interaction for most humans? Undergoing torture and crucifixion, as Jesus Christ did, would normally be EXTREMELY traumatic to both the incarnated consciousness as well as for the deep subconscious. Normally, it would be expected to have a catastrophic impact on the overall vibration of the being and, in fact, probably ensure, in most cases, that the soul would find itself stuck in limbo and needing a Spirit Rescue as a result. Yet, he rose from the dead in physical form and eventually ascended to heaven. His death is widely considered a victory over evil, but it’s hard to claim victory if you simply become more traumatized and limited than before. So just HOW did Jesus “beat the odds” and overcome the well-known traumatic hazards of such a cruel death as he endured? What can Creator tell us?6 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola