Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
It has been reported that the US government has accumulated a hoard of Bitcoin worth 15-20 billion dollars through confiscation of illegal funds. This hoarding was launched by Pres. Trump who halted what would have been ongoing sales to convert Bitcoin to cash. Is this a sinister move, in order to create a way to trigger collapse of that asset by dumping a large amount of Bitcoin on the market to start a collapse at some point in the future?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “About a month ago I experienced a bright light in the corner of the ceiling with black hands reaching outward and a human-like figure standing next to my bed. He appeared to be wearing a fedora and a dress overcoat and was smoking. I heard a sound like a match being struck but there was no odor. I felt as though there were two figures toward the head of my bed but I could not see them. I called out to God and Jesus and then do not remember anything else. Last week I experienced the hands again and no figures. I called out to source Creator and it all stopped. I would like to know anything about this. I ask for Source Creator’s protection daily for myself and Grandson.” What can we tell her about the origin of these experiences and what will help?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
100 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that in today’s world, no human being can be trusted as an authority because of the corruption and mind control manipulation of our culture. Perhaps an example is the current controversy about a seemingly straightforward issue: whether or not crime in Washington D.C. needs urgent attention or has actually fallen. President Trump ordered 800 National Guard troops into the capitol, ostensibly to make the city safer, which is derided by the political left even though officials state that the police force is understaffed by 800 officers due to budget cuts. Meanwhile, a D.C. police commander was suspended a few months ago for allegedly under-reporting crime statistics. Others have pointed out that in Washington, and other sanctuary cities, defunding the police lowers crime statistics because lack of police action lets crime go unreported. Police are also under pressure to make things look good, and actually log serious crimes as minor ones, and many arrested criminals are simply let go as liberal prosecutors and judges will just dismiss the charges. What is the divine perspective? Is criminality a serious problem being aided and abetted by lax enforcement or is this Federal intervention just fearmongering and political posturing with a dangerous authoritarian motivation?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
The famous quote about the effectiveness of telling lies, from Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, has a second part that is perhaps a clue to a deeper truth: “If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it,” then Goebbels continues, “And you will even come to believe it yourself!” Is that reflecting his personal witnessing of alien mind control without realizing its sinister reach and power to manipulate human beliefs?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
We noticed our dog start to reduce his activity and become lethargic and unwilling to take stairs, etc., right after we returned from a 12-day trip while our son stayed in our home to dog-sit. The vet has been unable to diagnose a physical malady. Could our absence, perhaps experienced as possible abandonment, have triggered past karmic trauma to undermine his health? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Source Creator, since the Scandinavian Formulas Shark Liver Oil sold by Vitacost doesn’t ship to Canada and is difficult to get here from that company for some strange reason, would this alternative, Bell Lifestyle products Shark Liver Oil, 120 Soft gels, be an effective alternative? It contains 500mg of shark liver oil, 117.5mg of squalene and other beneficial fatty acids per capsule. Would taking 1 or 2 a day be an effective antiviral comparable to the Vitacost one and the Broad Spectrum CBD Oil from Hempland USA?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
79 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It is getting harder and harder seeing the days and nights going by with no clear signs of answers, especially answers that truly make a difference, and not just listening to what other people say, but unable to feel or verify anything in my own personal experience, which what truly matters to me. I like to think that I am helping making a difference, both for myself, others and the world, and maybe even other worlds, but feeling unable of confirming or verifying this in any way is getting increasingly frustrating to endure and is shaking my own faith, instead of helping it grow. Granted that we operate in a state of greatly diminished awareness and knowledge, as well as being subjected to sabotage, and heavy manipulations and suppression from cradle to grave, and we have no real awareness of the true size of the problems being addressed, nor how exactly this is being done, compared to light beings, but this situation does not help building faith, and I would be grateful if it is possible to hear what comments Creator can make on the matter and if He has any suggestions on how to improve things.” What is Creator’s perspective and what is most important for him to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Recently I started taking a sulforaphane supplement by the name of Broq and within two weeks I noticed surprising benefits. My energy levels have been slightly elevated along with my mood, my hair shedding has returned to normal levels and my complexion has improved. Does sulforaphane have anti-viral properties or is the sulforaphane working somewhere downstream to mitigate symptoms and damage caused by chronic viral infections? Can sulforaphane provide broad benefits to a majority of people by protecting against various forms of cancer, prevent cardiovascular disease, reduce symptoms of autism, and slow aging or are these claims exaggerations?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
81 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
33 views0 answers0 votes
The term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
When people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
An argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
81 views0 answers0 votes
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
21 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…689Next »
Ask Question