Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How much does past life trauma stemming from being a member of the wrong consensus, play into people’s current perceived need to be in the “right” one today? The right one being the “safest” one, perhaps?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
503 views0 answers0 votes
One of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
444 views0 answers0 votes
Airplane pilots need to know which way the wind is blowing before attempting a takeoff. To do this, they will lick their finger and stick it into the air. This same kind of “check,” to see which way the “right consensus” is thinking, is observed almost everywhere. Another analogy would be to think of people walking around with a mini satellite dish on their head, that is connected 24-7 to their consensus database, like social media or a particular news outlet, so they’re never confused about what is “safe” information and what is “dangerous” information? What is Creator’s perspective of these analogies?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
559 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
528 views0 answers0 votes
Placing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
545 views0 answers0 votes
It would seem that one of the core operating principles of effective mind control manipulation is to win people’s obedience to a consensus, by simply controlling the content of that consensus. Controlling the content of a consensus can frequently be done with simple, repeated propaganda. And yet, so few people seem to recognize just how easily a consensus can be socially engineered and manipulated. They are certainly made aware this happens, especially when it’s pointed out to them in an obvious way. Yet they continue to resist. How much stress does shutting out this awareness cause, and how damaging can it be?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
639 views0 answers0 votes
Gaining wisdom would seem to be the proper way to graduate from consensus thinking—knowing the truth but having enough awareness that putting it on full display can be hazardous to one’s health. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help every human obtain that wisdom in the least painful and traumatic way possible?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
592 views0 answers0 votes
A client writes: “Sorry to bother you but I’m just checking in regarding my status. I lost my smell this evening, which worries me. That is supposed to be one of the early symptoms of COVID-19. I don’t want this to go to my lungs. What can I do?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
510 views0 answers0 votes
Will more sessions of deep subconscious channeling with trauma resolution help my client’s dementia symptoms?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
431 views0 answers0 votes
A client asks: “After the Lightworker Healing Protocol and deep subconscious channeling, I have had no leg pain but around my knee sometimes feels numb and an MRI scan I had at the hospital when I was in severe pain re my leg, has come up showing two bulges at the top of both hips in the lower back. I have a bit of pain in the left lower back. Could you please ask Creator about this, or would you recommend another deep subconscious channeling?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
413 views0 answers0 votes
When a client requests a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for someone who will be hospitalized for surgery that is weeks away, is it best to launch the session immediately, or just before the event, so the healing requests are done closer to the medical intervention?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
449 views0 answers0 votes
Here’s a tale of two auto accidents: Both drivers end up in intensive care with multiple broken bones and internal injuries that nearly take the life of both. Imagine both have precisely the same injuries. One is back on the road in three months, and the other never drives again, and even has panic attacks when riding as a passenger. So while both sustained the same physical injuries from identical accidents, they differ in terms of developing long-term trauma. One essentially brushes the whole thing off as “no big deal” and the other is severely traumatized to the point of post-traumatic stress disorder. Can we assume from the identical injuries, that similar karma was the reason for the accidents in the first place? Can Creator predict (given the question is hypothetical) the likely karmic future of both individuals absent a divine healing intervention?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
553 views0 answers0 votes
Considering our example above, it is assumed healing performed by the divine in response to Lightworker Healing Protocol requests would do wonders for the deeply traumatized victim. Such healing would likely remove or at least seriously reduce panic attacks, and likely allow this person to resume driving and getting on with life. But now the question is about susceptibly to repeat trauma should either of our examples suffer a repeat tragedy—for whatever reason, karmic or otherwise. If we can assume the first individual who brushed off the first accident can simply do it again, what of the second individual? Is the second one likely to have a similar level of crippling trauma, necessitating a whole new round of divine healing intervention?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
543 views0 answers0 votes
Back in the seventies, in the typical suburban setting, there was a young man who developed a reputation for disappearing whenever there was conflict in the air. He was well-liked by the vast majority he encountered, and his friendship was widely sought by many. He was kind and generous to a fault, almost never critical, and a really good listener. Yet, at the slightest hint of trouble, “poof” he was gone. Was his disappearing a coping, fear-driven response to trauma that conflict could bring, or a wise response from one who was simply skilled at avoiding potentially troublesome entanglements? Maybe a little of both? Can Creator shed some light on this?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
553 views0 answers0 votes
Deep-seated trauma can push people to develop no end of unique and even quirky coping skills. But once developed, because they have a track record of some success, such skills will likely continue to be called upon for new situations even if the underlying trauma is handled well and healed. To what extent do such behaviors that would be better off abandoned, continue to have a life of their own and become a bad habit, rather than being eliminated once healing has been achieved?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
524 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…357358359360361…699Next »
Ask Question