Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
Has there been any change in the ET planned sequence for the financial collapse triggered by the tidal power outages, then gold reset, then Alien Disclosure, and then withdrawal of the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
Does it look like the financial collapse, tidal power outages, gold reset, and then Alien Disclosure will start soon now, or has there been a significant delay for some reason since I last asked about this?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
280 views0 answers0 votes
Advanced Bionutritionals recently announced sale of Thyrovanz which contains 100 mg of bovine thyroid glandular powder. This natural ingredient includes thyroid hormones T1, T2, T3, T4, and Calcitonin, which supports healthy thyroid function. Is the only advantage of Thyrovanz that it will better help the 15% of hypothyroid patients who have abnormal conversion of T4 to T3 than would be done using the Armour Thyroid extract, or does Thyrovanz also deliver a healthier balance or more effective supplementation of endogenous hormone production?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
155 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I don’t see anything on the Creator database about creatine, but it has a lot of press, if you will, on YouTube and elsewhere from prominent people, such as Dr. Paul Saladino, longevity researcher Rhonda Patrick, and Joe Rogan. It’s supposed to be extremely good for strength and muscle recovery, as well as cognitive benefits, and earlier recommended daily amounts should be tripled. Back in the 90s, I recall using creatine monohydrate and I see now that research indicates 60% better uptake with creatine hydroxychloride. Have you looked into this area?” What is Creator’s perspective about the relative benefit of creatine supplementation for building muscle mass? How does it compare to using Advanced Muscle Plus and Advanced Amino Powder?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
234 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How effective is creatine supplementation for cognitive performance compared to the memory-enhancing FocusIQ supplement from PrimalForce.net or the Advanced Memory Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “When the LHP removes spirit attachments they are offered rehabilitation. Some accept, but most probably decline and they are ‘removed’ from the scene. We know and have heard the term ‘catch and release’ more than once. The question is where are they released to when dealt with in a Spirit Rescue scenario? Are they even moved at all, or is it more like being handcuffed and placed in the squad car only until the ‘victim’ (the one being rescued and helped to the light) is transitioned and safe, and then these spirits who declined rehab are simply ‘uncuffed and released?'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “We also know that the divine and archangels have set up a shield around Earth to prevent further incursion by the forces of evil in spirit form. My intuition tells me it’s just hold them in place until the rescue is over, and then release them right where they’re at. The question is, can we do one better? Can we ask that they be removed from Earth altogether and released beyond the shield the divine has set up in response to LHP requests? Or is this something the divine would prefer not to do, as it will hasten their demise and essentially not give them every opportunity to be rescued themselves?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “If it is deemed a ‘fair’ strategy, to release forces of evil in spirit form from Earth altogether and released beyond the shield the divine has set up in response to LHP requests, given they’ve been cut off from Divine Life Support, are essentially illegal trespassers, and in consideration of future, hapless victims, can we request this be done? Could this be an enhancement to the LHP? (Funny how this question so strongly parallels the current illegal immigrant and border situation, and ICE and Trump’s agenda to deport them. At the very least, this answer should reveal more about the divine dilemma regarding this topic.)” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
175 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “My friend’s daughter [name withheld] passed away from her brain tumor a month ago. She has been on my Divine Life Support Wish List and I have done many protocols for her. She lived with the diagnosis for much longer than initially predicted. Her faith in God was deep. I just want to make sure she is in the light. Anything you can share would be so helpful to her mom.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have tried supplements for sleep, but don’t seem to find them beneficial. I am wondering if Creator has given you any suggestions or recommendations to help people with sleep. My husband really suffers from lack of sleep. He wakes at 3 am and cannot fall back asleep. He has so much difficulty with focus and probably would be diagnosed with ADHD, but the lack of sleep does not help the situation.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
98 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…678910…694Next »
Ask Question