A viewer asks: “Which supplement would provide more abundant health, Ultra Accel 2 or Telo X Nano from Dr. Sears? I see that Telo X Nano works on the telomeres but Ultra Accel 2 works on mitochondria. Both seem good but the expense would be too much. Also, if taking Telo X Nano, would the telomeres shorten right away or would there be more lasting effects? Would using Telo X Nano negatively affect someone with pre-cancer/cancer as opposed to Ultra Accel 2 which may prevent its formation?” What can Creator tell us?

These two products differ in what they are designed to target and, accordingly, the benefits they can achieve. It is not possible to make a general statement about superiority because people vary in what they most need. So a person who has a life-threatening situation that can be prevented by one of the products does not outweigh the fact there are others for whom the other product would provide such a benefit. Your channel is working to find cost-effective answers for the dilemma of there being now a growing number of such nutritional supplements. A somewhat simplistic answer would be to differentiate between these two products based on the likelihood an intended recipient is being adversely affected already by the consequences of aging for which the Telo X Nano would be more urgently needed. But even here, even young people sometimes get cancer and if that were prevented by the Ultra Accel 2 it might prevent an early death. So this illustrates why it is not possible to compare apples with oranges and say one is better than the other. The Telo X Nano will not have adverse effects, with respect to people developing cancer or not, so it will be safe to use but again does different things. The telomere shortening is not instantaneous but there is a need lifelong to protect the telomeres, so this speaks to adopting its use early and continuing to take it.