Cavendish writes, “Numerology is simply an extended study of vibration and the numbers from 1 to 9 make a complete cycle of vibration. … The numerologist’s universe is like a gigantic musical instrument which has innumerable strings.” What is Creator’s perspective?

This is indeed a useful analogy because music is mathematical. The reason certain musical tones, and the intervals separating them, have a particular pleasantness to the ear is because, mathematically, they are in an ordered arrangement in a hierarchy. The ability to perceive it as having a kind of sensory experience that, if done with skill, gives rise to pleasure is a gift from the divine to make mathematics come alive, in a sense, at least in that setting, symbolically, so that mathematics can be enjoyed in an abstract way and as a visceral experience because it is coming through the senses, not as an idea but experienced by the physical body and a delight to the mind. This shows that the field of mathematics is not simply a human intellectual invention that is largely separate from reality and more a potential amusement, like constructing a puzzle that is only an abstraction but has a definition and a physical analog that can be manipulated and will follow certain rules and predictable characteristics, and so on, but is nothing but an invention of the mind. Mathematics is much deeper; it is a representation of foundational principles that order the universe in certain ways and correspond to energies of various kinds. There are a vast array of such energies and these can be depicted numerically, through mathematics, to ponder their interrelationships and to make predictions about their effects simply from the mathematics in the architecture alone. This is difficult to explain and comprehend, as a generality, as there are countless examples of things throughout the universe that have a mathematical description that will be quite meaningful and allow a deep understanding and many predictions about possibilities, strictly from that architectural feature, and this is why the practice of numerology can lead to useful insight if it is based on mathematical reality and not some corrupted thinking in the mix as well. That often happens with truisms of all kinds—moral, philosophical, and scientific. But what we are conveying here is there is a risk always of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, to disparage something like numerology, based on a superficial representation of what it is and what it can convey, when there are true and deeper mathematical interrelationships that lend themselves quite nicely to such representation as using an abstract mathematical language to define and describe and predict their characteristics.