Nicola Staff asked 2 years ago
Unfortunately, this is not the case, so it is a combination of accurate, less than accurate but plausible, and incorrect information. In its broad outlines, it is plausible. That is typically the nature of false channeling. It gives enough in a semblance of truth to be satisfying or even quite intriguing but in the absence of deeper knowledge oneself, it is easy to be fooled into thinking you have hit the motherload and this great revelation will be something you can count on and use as a guide in understanding whatever the subject might be. In this case, we would say that the benefits in sorting through all of the pieces of information would not be worth the time invested, and to align yourself with this source would be not only unproductive in the long run but dangerous.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
