DWQA Questions › Tag: atheismFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, claimed that all religions were developed by the Anunnaki as forms of mind control, and control of human behaviors. Is that a correct view?” Can you put this in perspective for us concerning the truth of the divine?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Religions401 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said the cross applied to someone before death on his chest as a form of having given the last rites in fact closes the chakras and assures that the soul goes to an Anunnaki recycling portal and is trapped again and again for many lifetimes against its unique will and essence. If this is true how we can avoid this at the time of death?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Religions662 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said what is even more scary is that they may come on Earth again trying to control the masses through a personification of Jesus as his second coming and people will follow them blindly not questioning the increase of more and more control. Is this all true? What can we do as Christians to not fall in this false coming?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Religions386 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “About what the Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said, where are the fallen angelics in all this? Are the Anunnaki the fallen angelics? The Pleiadians do not mention them.”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers313 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “The Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, do not mention any other ETs such as the Reptilians and Arcturians and their role and interest in controlling and manipulating humans. They also do not mention Creator’s Plan in all the history of the Anunnaki. What would be the Pleiadians intention in not analyzing all these?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers401 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “About what the Pleiadians, channeled by Barbara Marciniak, said, they also claim to be us from the future and came back to fix some things needed to be done a long time ago, but do not mention what exactly.” Can you help us understand this?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Benevolent Extraterrestrials552 views0 answers0 votesIf one has friends or acquaintances willing to discourse with you about what’s “real” and what’s “not,” would performing a Lightworker Healing Protocol session for them, potentially help them to be more open-minded and receptive to what you have to share?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs243 views0 answers0 votesSocrates said, “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” Most atheists have been observed to make liberal use of the tool of “slander” in controlling a conversation and putting their well-intentioned opponent in a difficult position. But it has further been observed, that if one “stands strong,” and continues with their dialogue, unwavering and unaffected, many times the conversation can actually continue productively. Can Creator share advice on what to expect and how best to proceed when one is faced with an onslaught of “slander?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs229 views0 answers0 votesIn life, it is often true that before you can build something new, you first have to tear down something old. It’s been observed that many atheists have quite strong “faith” in their outlook and world views. So before they can even become receptive to new ideas, their currently “full” cup must be emptied. Anyone attempting to help someone empty a cup they are grasping tightly should expect quite a bit of resistance. But resistance isn’t always a retreat, or abandonment of the engagement, quite the opposite. If they are resisting, but not retreating, and are willing to engage, is that enough to allay any concerns about “coercing” them against their will?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs233 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed that atheists have a kind of “hunt and destroy” approach to anything outside their world views. So while the would-be evangelist is attempting to empty and refill the cup of the atheist, the atheist is actually attempting to do the very same thing, but in reverse. Unfortunately, atheists are often better prepared in these contests, which is one of the reasons that if one of the parties is likely to come away disillusioned, it’s the evangelist and not the atheist. Can Creator comment on the importance of knowing what you are getting into, and choosing your battles carefully and wisely?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs216 views0 answers0 votesOne of the apparent attractions of atheism is that it is widely embraced by the smart, accomplished and savvy, while belief in the divine is portrayed as primitive, dumb, gullible, and the desperate clinging of people who can’t think for themselves and who are afraid of their own shadows. This is a VERY significant presumption to have to counter and dispel. Can Creator share the best strategy for countering this outlook most effectively?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs244 views0 answers0 votesCreator has shared that humans are divine, but that atheism leads inexorably to depravity. Most atheists have a kind of utopian outlook for atheism that itself is a kind of fairy tale that doesn’t hold water when examined critically. Showing them that all atheistic outlooks eventually lead to depravity on a gargantuan scale, has been found to be an effective, but not pleasant approach to “raining on their parade.” This seems contrary to the preferred divine means of spreading love through positive reinforcements and messaging. Can Creator comment on the importance of “telling it like it is?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs273 views0 answers0 votesThe reality and nature of consciousness is one of the central topics of contention when conversing with atheists. Most do not believe in the existence of non-local consciousness in any form. Yet Creator has shared that everything is consciousness in actuality, and the interlopers would seem to have an outlook on non-local consciousness that is not as strict as that embraced by human atheists. What is the difference in outlook if any? Do the interlopers view the universe as primarily “dead,” as opposed to the divine reality of it all being ALIVE? Creator shared that the alien outlook is that non-local consciousness is a kind of “echo” that is a reflection of consciousness, but not ACTUALLY consciousness? Can Creator clarify whether or how true that is?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs244 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed, that for most human atheists, the REAL bone of contention, isn’t the existence or non-existence of God, but rather the rejection of a tyrannical, hypocritical, arbitrary and capricious God who they view as “no friend of theirs.” In some ways, it appears like an ironic rejection of the Extraterrestrial Alliance who in fact are the ones who actually behave this way. Yet, it’s God who suffers the rejection. Can Creator comment on this perspective of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs256 views0 answers0 votesIt’s a long conversation to bring an atheist to the point where a discussion on the relative power and promise of prayer can even begin to be discussed. Atheists seem to want to avoid this particular topic more than any other. Can Creator share any insights on why this appears to be the case?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Limiting Beliefs271 views0 answers0 votes