DWQA Questions › Tag: religious dogmaFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesWe think of inner corruption as being impairment of moral principle, virtue, or values. Since it is assumed that no being is created “corrupt,” then inner corruption is somehow an acquired state of existence. Can Creator weigh in on this definition, as well as address the concept of “original sin” in terms of our spiritual origins as beings?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption588 views0 answers0 votesWhile it is assumed no being is created in a state of corruption, clearly some individual beings or souls appear more susceptible to inner mental corruption than others. Because who and what we are as newly created consciousness at the birth of our souls is endowed and not chosen, it seems unfair that some would have greater vulnerability than others. Is there any truth to this supposition, or are all equally vulnerable to inner corruption?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption452 views0 answers0 votesRare is the human mind that is not chaotic and stressful, at least some of the time. There is an assumption that one’s mind is one’s own, but if we’ve learned anything in this project, it’s that the human mind is anything but isolated and subject only to influences arriving from the five senses. People may think that is the case, but the reality is dramatically different. Can Creator comment on this notion of the mind being one’s own and how much of it shaped from influences other than the five senses?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption446 views0 answers0 votesOne of the hallmark traits of the corrupted soul is the enigmatic belief in their entitlement, that Creator, the universe, or the poor soul they are manipulating owes them something, if only as a proxy to the truly responsible party causing them harm. Can Creator comment on where in Hades they got this idea?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption472 views0 answers0 votesAnother seeming belief that the corrupted possess is the idea that their suffering is somehow license or currency that excuses their abuse of others. The flaw in their thinking is that in the real world, currency has universal value to everyone, but NO ONE wants someone else’s suffering in trade for anything. Where does this completely illogical notion come from?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption404 views0 answers0 votesAnother false belief of many corrupted souls is that they are already damned and irredeemable. They appear to honestly believe they have no future, or a desirable future in any sense, so their motto seems to become “eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.” They seem to believe that one can only become damned once, and having crossed that threshold, they have nothing more to lose, and may find it oddly liberating. Can Creator comment on whether this is not only wrong, but a tragically foolhardy notion?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption384 views0 answers0 votesIs this notion of being somehow liberated by being damned, an idea the fallen angelics have embraced?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption484 views0 answers0 votesSpirit attachments are responsible for a great deal of inner turmoil. Lost soul spirits attach to humans to find refuge and safe harbor from victimization by the dark spirits. Can dark spirit and lost soul attachments have their own attachments? If so, is there a limit to how many?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption439 views0 answers0 votesFor the typical human being with the typical spread of seven attachments (one for each major chakra) how much of life’s troubles and traumas stem from these attachments, versus the karmic legacy and baggage that every human carries?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption502 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the answer to inner corruption? Can Creator also comment, how belief replacement will also be necessary for many souls saddled with deep inner corruption to truly find the path back to the divine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption532 views0 answers0 votesA client called me about her issue of being sexually stimulated against her will by an entity. She also has experiences of being stalked, and having her phone and computer hacked. What is causing these events, and are they interrelated?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Lost Soul Spirits362 views0 answers0 votesWill my work on her behalf with the Lightworker Healing Protocol be helpful? Is she a targeted individual?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Lost Soul Spirits377 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “As a longtime Buddhist practitioner and now a mindfulness teacher myself, I continue to struggle with trying to make sense of some of the core teachings in Buddhism. One of the three “marks of existence” that all Buddhist practices are centered around understanding through increasingly direct and deep insight/realizations on the path to enlightenment is “no self” or “not self” (annata), which includes that there is no such thing as a permanent, unchanging entity or “soul.” It is said that in his quest for enlightenment, the Buddha looked deeply for the “housebuilder,” the one behind the whole thing, this experience of “I, me, myself,” the doer, and he couldn’t find one, and found instead that all phenomena, including the experience of a fixed entity called a self or soul, were simply the result of interdependent causes and conditions coming together temporarily, including even consciousness itself, which arises temporarily to meet with sensory experiences (which includes the 6th sense of mind) and that this consciousness we experience, too, dies with the body. Of course, there is something that experiences rebirth, as Buddhism was very, very clear on that … Since the goal, enlightenment, involves the ONLY permanent death … The cessation of rebirth. One of my primary teachers stated that what gets reborn is not a “soul,” but our “habits.” I am really hoping that Creator can shed some light on these things, since the teachings of the Buddha are what I resonate with the most, and yet I am also an LHP practitioner and do believe in the divine realm and love the idea of having/being an “immortal soul.” The LHP itself I do see as basically a lovingkindness/compassion/sympathetic joy/equanimity (Divine Abodes) practice, and therefore an extension of Buddhist practice. I accept that especially because the teachings of the Buddha were not written down until hundreds of years after his death that they could have become corrupted, and that given the depth of dark manipulation on Earth they most certainly were. However, this teaching, that there is no soul, that there is no self, is basically THE most important teaching in all of Buddhism. The Suttas (sacred ancient Buddhist texts) quote the Buddha as saying, “Nothing whatsoever is to be taken as I, mine, myself. Whoever has understood this has understood all the teachings.” How are we to make sense of this?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Religions538 views0 answers0 votesWhy did the Pleiadians make this categorical channeled statement to Barbara Marciniak: “When you are dealing with the angels, you are dealing with the Anunnaki?” Might she have introduced some personal bias?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Religions594 views0 answers0 votesThe Pleiadians also said: “Heaven and Anu are synonymous.” Why this blanket condemnation in linking heaven with the leader of the alien Anunnaki race who are subjugating us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Religions531 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola