Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Susy Smith wrote: “Another illustration of tongue-speaking that brings a message to someone who is least expecting it is related by Harold Hill in his book, How to Live Like a King’s Kid. He writes: ‘When another man came and sat in the prayer chair, I laid hands on him and prayed for him in the Spirit, praying in tongues. When the prayer was over, the scoffer (a man standing nearby and skeptically watching) was blubbering like a baby, crying up a storm, slobbering all over his expensive blue serge suit. “What ails you?” I asked. “Well,” he said, “I don’t know if the man in the chair got anything, but God spoke to me when you prayed for him, because you were praying in High German. I’m a student of High German, and I doubt if even you know it, because it’s a rare language.” I said, “I don’t know any German, high, low or medium.” “Well,” he said, “Who are you to scoff at my gifts?” And that big blubbering man got saved.'” What is Creator’s perspective, and how does this fit within the Divine Rules of Engagement, since the recipient was characterized as a “scoffer?” Why did he get this miracle and not the scores of diehard atheists and skeptics also scoffing at this?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
198 views0 answers0 votes
Susy Smith wrote: “Don Basham tells in his book, Handbook on Tongues: Interpretation & Prophecy, of a man he knew was the speaker at a Christian meeting: ‘At one point he stopped his message and began speaking in tongues. This was immediately followed by an interpretation of the tongue by someone in the audience. Then the man resumed his message. After the service, a Frenchman came up to the speaker and told him that the message in tongues was in the French language and that the interpretation that followed had been a perfect translation in English of what had been spoken in French. But neither the speaker nor interpreter knew any French.'” It should be noted that these miracles tend to occur in an atmosphere of expectation where, in some settings, they may even be commonplace. Certainly, they have tremendous persuasive value for both the faithful and curious newcomers. But outside the doors of these churches, they don’t get much airplay. And most who experience these moments are likely hesitant to talk about them for fear of appearing silly. Given the fundamental and dogmatic leanings of most of these churches, it seems like these miracles are not being targeted for greatest effect. In fact, they appear to reinforce the insular cul-de-sac nature of these churches as be-all and end-all establishments when, in fact, in some ways, they might be contributing to an ultimate disempowerment of humanity at the same time they fill a void for the individuals involved. Do they, in effect, keep people stuck circling the airport in a holding pattern? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
191 views0 answers0 votes
For the apostles, speaking in tongues was a means to an end. A means by which the same message could be delivered to people of diverse languages. But today, speaking in tongues seems to have become an end in itself, that somehow speaking in tongues is emblematic of “being in the spirit,” “of being saved,” “of being accepted by Jesus,” and if you are not speaking in tongues, you are not among the favored of the Lord. Have we missed the point? Susy Smith wrote, “St. Paul said, ‘For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God; for no man understandeth him …'” What problem is that solving? Creator has said in past channelings that many church gatherings have value in that they can effectively create a “group high” and, indeed, lift the moods of those involved, but secular music concerts can accomplish the same thing. And no one considers someone exalting in a popular entertainer’s music as “God’s elect.” Just because it feels good doesn’t mean growth is occurring, that the world is improving, and that things are going to get better. Now, there is nothing wrong with a good “group high,” but is it “moving the needle” in the effort to save humanity the way it needs to move? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
302 views0 answers0 votes
Ironically, though Susy Smith set out to write a book that largely promulgates the message, “Let go and let God,” she finished the book with a warning that ALL should take to heart. She wrote, “Although the illustrations I have to offer involve demented people who have undoubtedly become possessed by evil spirits or satanic influences, others who are not at all deranged, may be self-deluded by their religious fervor and do things their intelligence should advise against, because they believe, ‘God told me to do it,’ or ‘Jesus asked me.’ Quite the most appalling thing that I know about personally, occurred to a Lutheran minister friend of mine. … On Thanksgiving morning, this pastor was conducting a religious service in a new chapel he had recently built on his home property. His wife … his two daughters and his mother-in-law, and a psychotic patient he was treating along with other neighbors and friends were in attendance. While the pastor was praying, his eyes closed and his Bible in his hands, the patient pulled out a huge, sharp knife and slashed the pastor’s throat, nearly decapitating him. … The most impossibly horrible thing about this was that all the time he was killing my friend, the man was shouting, ‘Praise the Lord’ and ‘I’m doing this for Jesus.'” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
196 views0 answers0 votes
Speaking in tongues once served a critical need, which arguably is no longer needed due to the modern advent of Internet communications and even real-time translation software and utilities. The language barrier that has existed since shortly after the reseeding of humanity some 200,000 years ago, and encapsulated in the biblical Tower of Babel story, is firmly coming down. Language is no longer a barrier in our modern world. Therefore, as remarkable and inspiring as speaking in tongues is, it just isn’t needed like it once was. And it certainly isn’t needed if, as St. Paul put it, “no man understandeth him.” So what IS needed? Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need now to be in divine alignment and save humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
264 views0 answers0 votes
Would my client who has worsening vision problems benefit from taking Advanced Vision Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals, or is taking the previously recommended hyaluronic acid supplement from Horbaach in the 1000 mg dose sufficient? Would taking both be ideal and worth the investment?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
Is Garrett Goggin’s Golden Portfolio of mining stocks’ five best picks a sound and highly lucrative investment to invest in while awaiting the gold reset?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
323 views0 answers0 votes
How would an equal investment in Garrett Goggin’s five best picks rank in comparison to NUGT, Seabridge Gold, AngloGold Ashanti, Franco-Nevada, or Royal Gold in the first 1-2 years following the gold reset?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
313 views0 answers0 votes
How would the Golden Portfolio rank against Kinross, Avino, Contango, or Wheaton Precious Metals in the first 1-2 years following the gold reset?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
178 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Black, loose tea can be purchased in a variety of leaf size. The larger they are, the more nuanced taste. The smaller they are and more dust-like, the more tannic, brisk, and strong in taste during the oxidation process. As black tea is part of the Divine’s supplements list, which is the best? I prefer the taste of larger leaves, but is this not enough to be of health benefit? Does it have to be of the strong taste variety?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I will often watch a program about something and see someone that has passed over and have in mind to include that person in my next LHP-DSMR session. However, I sometimes can’t remember the person I had in mind for when I do a session, but do remember that there was someone I wanted to include. Can Creator still go back to that initial thought I had and include it as part of the session with my intention to want this person as part of my protocol session? I would have said yes, but perhaps this isn’t so?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
You told us some time back that a good ratio for doing a series of healings would be to do an equal number of Deep Subconscious Channeling with Trauma Resolution and Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions, by simply alternating them in sequence. Is this still the case, or has the coupling of LHP with the Deep Subconscious Mind Reset protocol compensated for the more labor-intensive deep subconscious channeling approach, which requires a channeler and a facilitator?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
185 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
287 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
190 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Before the human genome was degraded by the Anunnaki, it is said that the divine human could converse with Creator via a type of natural duplex communication system. As a result, was belief in the Almighty made easier for the Divine Human? Was faith still necessary for an understanding of Creator’s existence? If not, then what can be said for the notion that Creator didn’t lead, and was the Free Will Paradigm, from a human perspective, different in any way when compared to the present?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…2425262728…708Next »
Ask Question