Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In doing HMR Level 2 work on the deep subconscious, in addition to asking for all the younger selves to reflect on and identify beliefs they came away with from their particular trauma event so they can be replaced later as a group, can we also still request a description of those they had in common?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
433 views0 answers0 votes
The original HMR process for a Level 2 resolution, calls for the facilitator to ask the subconscious mind: “If you lined up all those who contributed to that pile [of negative emotions], can you see who might be in that lineup?” You told us that giving the client’s mind the option to hand the pile of negative emotion caused by the perpetrators back to them “for their higher selves to deal with” was ill-advised as this would create a karmic penalty for the client because it was not just a harmless mental fantasy that might be satisfying to “balance the books” by releasing animosity, but would mount an actual psychic attack through the power of consciousness. Is it safe to simply delete this step, especially now that we are adding more thorough help for all the younger selves and their traumas?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
519 views0 answers0 votes
This show’s questions are inspired by the writings of America’s Longshoreman Philosopher, Eric Hoffer, whose book, The True Believer, is considered a literary classic. Hoffer wrote this intriguing passage on nature and compassion: “Nature has no compassion. It is, in the words of William Blake, ‘a creation that groans, living on death; where the fish and bird and beast and tree and metal and stone live by devouring.’ Nature accepts no excuses, and the only punishment it knows is death.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
542 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote the following: “The resentment of the weak does not spring from any injustice done to them but from their sense of impotence. They hate not wickedness but weakness. When it is in their power to do so, the weak destroy weakness whenever they find it. Woe to the weak when they are preyed upon by the weak! The self-hatred of the weak is likewise an instance of their hatred of weakness.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
500 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “When we are conscious of our worthlessness, we naturally expect others to be finer and better than we are. If then we discover any similarity between them and us, we see it as irrefutable evidence of their worthlessness and inferiority. It is thus that with some people familiarity breeds contempt.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
497 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “We associate brittleness and vulnerability with those we love, while we endow those we hate with strength and indestructibility.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
458 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “Patience is a by-product of growth – we can bide our time when it is time for our growth. There is no patience in acquisition or in the pursuit of power and fame. Nothing is so impatient as the pursuit of a substitute for growth.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
518 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “There are many who find a good alibi far more attractive than an achievement. For an achievement does not settle anything permanently. We still have to prove our worth anew each day: we have to prove we are as good today as we were yesterday. But when we have a valid alibi for not achieving anything we are fixed, so to speak, for life. Moreover, when we have an alibi for not writing a book, painting a picture, and so on, we have an alibi for not writing the greatest book and not painting the greatest picture. Small wonder that the effort expended and the punishment endured in obtaining a good alibi often exceed the effort and grief requisite for the attainment of a most marked achievement.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
495 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “The impulse of power is to turn every variable into a constant.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
556 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “It is clear that a society in the grip of fear, is not free no matter how numerous the freedoms its constitution guarantees. There are already many people in this country (America) who would surrender certain of their civil rights for a feeling of personal security.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
509 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “There is perhaps no better way of measuring the natural endowment of a soul, than by its ability to transmute dissatisfaction into a creative impulse. The genuine artist is as much dissatisfied as the revolutionary. Yet how diametrically opposed are the products each distills from his dissatisfaction.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
530 views0 answers0 votes
Hoffer wrote: “The genuine creator creates something that has a life of its own, something that can exist and function without him … With the noncreative it is the other way around: in whatever they do, they arrange things so that they themselves become indispensable.” How can Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol help to transform us into “genuine creators” rather than fearful controllers?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
495 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about concerns raised by Dr. Peter McCullough, a top Cardiologist: “The problem with the vaccine is Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE). Animals under study did not have initial adverse responses to coronaviruses, but when later re-exposed to the same or similar viruses, they basically had an autoimmune response and died. We know SARS-CoV-2 is dangerous. So it stands to reason that a vaccine designed to prime the immune system will carry risks. Creator has been careful to say, that OVERALL, people are better off, and the risks to health, and perhaps even long-term health, are LESS with the vaccine, than with facing COVID without any protection. The problem is, people have NO IDEA that the vaccine has such dire risks associated with it. Risks for a “few” granted, but if you are one of the unlucky ones, the risks can be quite severe, up to and including death.” Is Antibody-dependent Enhancement a serious concern in human vaccine recipients?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
568 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There are 14,000 deaths registered in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The swine flu vaccine was stopped after around 25 deaths. Just to put things in perspective.” Are vaccine-related deaths truly that large? Is the rate of deaths from the vaccine larger, and from a different cause, than infection with COVID-19 itself?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
513 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Some doctors were concerned about blood clots in the capillary system—too small to show up on X-rays. The only way to detect these clots, which I suspect is detecting NOT-normal blood coagulation activity and excessive clotting conditions, is a test called the D-dimer: https://labcorp.com/help/patient-test-info/d-dimer. The doctors concerned about this, believe the long-term health impacts are potentially grave. In fact, they are advising their patients to immediately get on prescription blood thinners to combat this condition. But here is the REALLY concerning piece of information. SIXTY-TWO PERCENT of all vaccine recipients who have taken the D-dimer test, test POSITIVE for excessive clotting conditions. What is Creator’s perspective? Is this anything to truly worry about? What are the implications if any? Or is it a temporary and mostly harmless response for the vast majority of vaccine recipients?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
564 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…350351352353354…726Next »
Ask Question