Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is it of benefit for the Lightworker Healing Protocol to include as clients, all beneficial microorganisms (e.g. Healthy gut bacteria), before the listing: insects, animals, and plants…?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
371 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can we as currently incarnated humans invite our oversouls and/or higher selves in the light to join in with their energies and intentions and to do Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions as well?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
370 views0 answers0 votes
There are some valid economic indicators showing that we are likely in a recession. The S&P500 corporate income over the past 6 months has been negative, yet stock prices have risen to record highs. Is this exuberance just human greed, is there a more sinister manipulation keeping investors complacent in the face of warning signs of trouble ahead, or is the end of the business cycle usually followed by recession being prevented through divine intervention?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
429 views0 answers0 votes
When we asked about the impact in terms of karma from someone killing themselves as an infant to avoid the troubled childhood they went through originally, you answered: “It would be too late to have undone those things influencing the person from the future, because their impact would have played out already and that karma would have had the intervening time to cause changes in the individual.” But then you said, and seemingly contradictory, “There would be a missing segment of trauma events no longer able to carry forward through a looping of time to influence the person adversely, so this would represent a potential benefit.” Can you explain which is true, or the contradictory answer more fully?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
414 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “My question was inspired by the last of the recent MAP webinars where you mentioned that prayers from people who wanted no war outbreak in the Middle East stand-off had contributed to allowing Creator to influence the situation. So instead of those prayers becoming redundant, by doing a LHP or multiple LHP sessions on these prayer requests, one could magnify the potential for divine intervention. I was wondering if an LHP practitioner could do as a primary client all the prayer requests made to Creator by all humans on earth in the past, present, and future. All prayers that are in divine alignment or somewhat in divine alignment. In effect, amplify those prayers and give them a perpetual energy?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
364 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can we expand all our previous sessions on individuals or groups by including new members to them in a similar fashion as we do with each Lightworker Healing Protocol version by doing a session on all our previous clients?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
400 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In the Lightworker Healing Protocol can we add a specific request to “Include as clients _____ whoever you now deem important to add to your previous sessions which you didn’t think of when you first launched them.” This way we can capitalize on all our previous sessions and reach many, many, more people or groups and, in a sense, accelerate the healing process of both humanity and its perpetrators.” Will this be effective to compound the benefit of previous sessions?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
366 views0 answers0 votes
I have as a request in the current Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Carry out these sessions in perpetuity throughout the current life as well as all past, present and future parallel lifetimes, their future extensions, and all future incarnations, commencing with their return to the womb.” Is the phrase, “all future incarnations,” actually redundant? I was thinking it might be needed in case a new incarnation was started by another projection of the soul.
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
345 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders: Our current Lightworker Healing Protocol reads, “Source Creator, invite the higher self of my clients to assist Creator in doing a Quantum Healing to bring in new instructions for the cells of the body from a future time of youthful health and wellbeing, apply it to all parallel past, current, and future lives and their future extensions, keeping it going with momentum, as a new reservoir of healing instructions that is available on an ongoing basis and redelivered in any new window of opportunity.” Should a clear distinction be made between the terms current and present? As in “the current life” (i.e. the one we are experiencing here and now) and “parallel present lives (more than one ongoing incarnation of our soul extension at the present time perhaps?)?” If so, should the wording above be changed to “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
Perhaps for the benefit of the understanding of our practitioners, would it be best to add, after the revision stated above, the phrase, “undertaken by portions of the soul?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
418 views0 answers0 votes
Similarly, in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, would it be advantageous to use the wording “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions” to all the steps for the Quantum Healing, sending love to unborn selves, requesting a Soul Reawakening, and sending Divine Ultimate Protection?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
322 views0 answers0 votes
In the Lightworker Healing Protocol, we currently ask for healing of all light beings with the following request: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol prior to their departure and transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol.” Will it be advantageous to expand the request for retroactive healing of all current light beings to say: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol throughout all parallel past and future lives and their future extensions, commencing with return to the womb and continuing until their successful transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
387 views0 answers0 votes
Do we need to specify the Nephilim as clients in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, or are they automatically included as we already specified both humans and extraterrestrials be included?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
352 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks about the Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Is it of value when asking for “release of all vows, oaths, contracts, agreements, allegiances, and promises made between my clients and any spirit attachment, dark spirit, alien, extragalactic, or interdimensional intruders and other attacking entities, alternate realities, and dimensions they have encountered” to also include THEMSELVES in the list of potential attackers?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
378 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders about asking in the Lightworker Healing Protocol for removal of all sources of negativity from food and beverages…but why not water, air, medications, toiletries such as makeup, toothpaste and mouthwash, alcohol, marijuana, and other recreational drugs? Would it be best, instead of “food and beverages” for all the above, to say “removal of all sources of negativity from anything inhaled, ingested, or absorbed by the body?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
416 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…481482483484485…653Next »
Ask Question