Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “My question was inspired by the last of the recent MAP webinars where you mentioned that prayers from people who wanted no war outbreak in the Middle East stand-off had contributed to allowing Creator to influence the situation. So instead of those prayers becoming redundant, by doing a LHP or multiple LHP sessions on these prayer requests, one could magnify the potential for divine intervention. I was wondering if an LHP practitioner could do as a primary client all the prayer requests made to Creator by all humans on earth in the past, present, and future. All prayers that are in divine alignment or somewhat in divine alignment. In effect, amplify those prayers and give them a perpetual energy?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
553 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can we expand all our previous sessions on individuals or groups by including new members to them in a similar fashion as we do with each Lightworker Healing Protocol version by doing a session on all our previous clients?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
568 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In the Lightworker Healing Protocol can we add a specific request to “Include as clients _____ whoever you now deem important to add to your previous sessions which you didn’t think of when you first launched them.” This way we can capitalize on all our previous sessions and reach many, many, more people or groups and, in a sense, accelerate the healing process of both humanity and its perpetrators.” Will this be effective to compound the benefit of previous sessions?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
517 views0 answers0 votes
I have as a request in the current Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Carry out these sessions in perpetuity throughout the current life as well as all past, present and future parallel lifetimes, their future extensions, and all future incarnations, commencing with their return to the womb.” Is the phrase, “all future incarnations,” actually redundant? I was thinking it might be needed in case a new incarnation was started by another projection of the soul.
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
548 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders: Our current Lightworker Healing Protocol reads, “Source Creator, invite the higher self of my clients to assist Creator in doing a Quantum Healing to bring in new instructions for the cells of the body from a future time of youthful health and wellbeing, apply it to all parallel past, current, and future lives and their future extensions, keeping it going with momentum, as a new reservoir of healing instructions that is available on an ongoing basis and redelivered in any new window of opportunity.” Should a clear distinction be made between the terms current and present? As in “the current life” (i.e. the one we are experiencing here and now) and “parallel present lives (more than one ongoing incarnation of our soul extension at the present time perhaps?)?” If so, should the wording above be changed to “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
553 views0 answers0 votes
Perhaps for the benefit of the understanding of our practitioners, would it be best to add, after the revision stated above, the phrase, “undertaken by portions of the soul?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
635 views0 answers0 votes
Similarly, in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, would it be advantageous to use the wording “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions” to all the steps for the Quantum Healing, sending love to unborn selves, requesting a Soul Reawakening, and sending Divine Ultimate Protection?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
458 views0 answers0 votes
In the Lightworker Healing Protocol, we currently ask for healing of all light beings with the following request: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol prior to their departure and transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol.” Will it be advantageous to expand the request for retroactive healing of all current light beings to say: “Carry out retroactive healing sessions on their behalf with the Protocol throughout all parallel past and future lives and their future extensions, commencing with return to the womb and continuing until their successful transition to the light, and include them in all future healing sessions described by this Protocol?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
682 views0 answers0 votes
Do we need to specify the Nephilim as clients in the Lightworker Healing Protocol, or are they automatically included as we already specified both humans and extraterrestrials be included?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
597 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks about the Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Is it of value when asking for “release of all vows, oaths, contracts, agreements, allegiances, and promises made between my clients and any spirit attachment, dark spirit, alien, extragalactic, or interdimensional intruders and other attacking entities, alternate realities, and dimensions they have encountered” to also include THEMSELVES in the list of potential attackers?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
577 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders about asking in the Lightworker Healing Protocol for removal of all sources of negativity from food and beverages…but why not water, air, medications, toiletries such as makeup, toothpaste and mouthwash, alcohol, marijuana, and other recreational drugs? Would it be best, instead of “food and beverages” for all the above, to say “removal of all sources of negativity from anything inhaled, ingested, or absorbed by the body?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
659 views0 answers0 votes
A client asks: “What is the deeper issue with my problems and pain in my neck and shoulder? I have been doing LHP sessions daily at least once, some days more often so, therefore, I would be included in the healing, but this issue is actually getting more intense lately. Is there a different way to get that issue resolved?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
479 views0 answers0 votes
We understand that all lifetimes, past, present, and future, are taking place in parallel. Do they have quite differing starting points in time relative to our perspectives of the current life? In other words, did many of our past lives start prior to the birth date of our current life, while future lives start some time beyond where we are in our current life? Are there no such consistencies, or does it perhaps not matter because there can be crosstalk with the current life regardless of starting and stopping points?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
651 views0 answers0 votes
Is it useful to consider the starting points of future extensions of the past, current, and future lifetimes relative to the current life being experienced, when we think about the karmic interplay through crosstalk?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
574 views0 answers0 votes
You commented previously that a problem healed effectively by a previous Lightworker Healing Protocol session could be reawakened by similar trauma occurring during an ongoing past life future extension, and through crosstalk with the present life, might undo the prior healing done. Will that type of problem now be prevented because of the latest Protocol provision to do repeat sessions in perpetuity? Will that catch new, emerging problems going forward?
ClosedNicola asked 6 years ago • 
569 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…554555556557558…726Next »
Ask Question