Nicola Staff asked 3 years ago
This is similar to many approaches embraced over the years by psychologists believing that words alone can change the being, decisions made within the mind, and substituting descriptive analysis and presumably a deeper and richer understanding of gain and loss with one’s perspective will be sufficient to shift well-entrenched difficulties for the better. This is occasionally of benefit but is quite naive in its understanding which is only a surface one. There are many deep inner conflicts the mainstream psychology community knows nothing about nor will they be able to probe the true arena underlying most human suffering, nor do they have the tools capable of changing things for the better in an effective fashion, even if they had access to the level of the mind needing help. That is what the techniques you are comparing to can do quite readily, employed in the best way, so we would not recommend this approach in lieu of the others you mentioned.
Please login or Register to submit your answer
