DWQA QuestionsCategory: Lightworker Healing ProtocolIf the intention to do a Lightworker Healing Protocol session is clear, is it as effective (or will it have at least some value) to do an LHP session while doing a menial task that doesn’t take much creative or discursive thought, like gardening or painting a room (or even listening to the LHP audio while driving) as it is to do it while in a quiet, concentrated meditative state? After becoming familiar with it from doing many sessions, won’t the subconscious pick up all the prompts even if the conscious attention lapses here and there?
Nicola Staff asked 5 years ago
If one is using the full Protocol, including the meditative introduction, it will shift the state of consciousness more towards an alpha/theta level. This would be dangerous to do while carrying out any kind of physical activity because it might lead to accidents of some kind. The main reason for not dividing one’s attention is because the use of the Protocol is serious business, and requires a serious and sincere commitment with the intention of the practitioner for each item of the Protocol, to receive its due attention and implementation both. The major purpose of witnessing, by which we mean focusing on the event itself for a time, if only a fairly brief interval, is to create a healing circuit with the client and hold this in place for a sufficient time for the healing energy to flow through you, to the client, and back to Creator once again. That is the role of your intention. It is not simply the launching of the request with the words alone. It is the follow-through, by providing the platform to support the work in the form of an energetic connection to the client. While this may not take very long for a given step of the Protocol, the division of attention that will happen in carrying out mundane activities simultaneously, while wanting to follow along with pre-recorded Protocol prompts, will dilute the energy by blurring the focus from moment to moment, as the subconscious must follow the conscious mind, being its primary duty. While it is always doing things behind the scenes, about which the conscious self is oblivious, this does not mean the subconscious is not multitasking, and that can influence the speed, accuracy, and thoroughness of what takes place. This is why distractions are distractions, and have a consequence with respect to any level of functioning, especially memory recall and the precision of physical activity that may be taking place concomitantly. This is why, even a professional golfer may ruin a shot if there is a sudden noise during his backswing that becomes a distraction. Even though the golfer has trained and has it all in muscle memory, and the subconscious has made the same shot many thousands of times, being called to alert status on command of the conscious self, reacting to something unexpected, will halt all of the instinctual level knowledge, and picking up the thread again may cause a disruption in the rhythm and the delivery both, and the results will be unsatisfactory. While the Protocol is being actually carried out by the divine realm, the maintenance of the healing circuit is essential to the process. This is why a casual, rote, thoughtless, recitation of the Protocol will not have the same impact as when you are devoting your full attention and faculties to the session. It must be so, because of the nature of energy. What you put your full attention to will receive your full energy. What you dabble at, what you do casually, in an offhand manner, dividing your focus of attention back and forth between two duties, will remove energy from both, and it is likely that, when comparing applying paint to a wall and doing the Protocol, that the Protocol outcome will suffer more. So this division of attention is never desirable, and is inviting compromise of the work. You have a moral responsibility in taking on a healing burden of someone to deliver the goods as best you can, and your description would be undercutting your true best efforts, and therefore would represent an ethical lapse.