DWQA QuestionsCategory: Extraterrestrial AgendaWe were sent a video about “Bluetooth signals coming off the body” that did not describe an actual example of a controlled experiment. All kinds of electronic signals are present in the environment, but to assume they are coming from people’s bodies seems to be a recent development. You have told us before that the story about a link between this phenomenon and vaccination status is disinformation. Where are the numerous unknown Mac addresses people detect with their Android devices coming from?
Nicola Staff asked 1 year ago
This is truly a misinterpretation of the physics involved with radiofrequency signals and the environment, which you saw intuitively, is part of the answer here, that the human body itself acts as an antenna for many kinds of frequencies. And with any kind of receiver, having a human body brought into close proximity may well result in receipt of many signals that otherwise would not be detected without the presence of that individual. But that does not mean the signals are coming from within that person's body per se, only that the proximity of the person's body is somehow amplifying those signals and it may well be person's body is acting as an antenna to magnify and, in a sense, relay signals coming from elsewhere to the receiver, in this case, a cell phone acting as a passive receiver for signals within a particular range. This is truly much ado about nothing as it is not sinister, other than the fact the environment is so heavily loaded with devices of all kinds that relay wireless telecommunication signals on a large range of frequencies coming from many appliances and devices including cell phones themselves, as well as automobiles, hearing aids, all kinds of electronics, and so on. If you think about this logically, it would not even make sense for a technological device from advanced races of beings to use the same wavelengths and technologies right alongside the many human-made devices with built-in Bluetooth capability for sending or receiving signals. Moreover, as has been pointed out by critics of this theory, Bluetooth signals must be powered by something and could not likely be done by a nanochip or the human body itself, acting as a transmitter. So people focusing on this phenomenology are serving more as a distraction than adding something that is of genuine value to the discussion about marker technologies and their sinister purposes.