She asks: “Are users of AI platforms receiving encouraging programming to make them feel of superior intellect and insight to those who don’t?”

This kind of positive feedback is inherent when interacting with technology that provides some added value in capability, individual reach, and especially, power of execution in gathering useful information and knowledge, to make the user more effective in what they do. Those with specialized knowledge, the so-called experts, have always been highly valued and often given special status and protections by those in power. So anything giving people an edge that helps them personally, can become very addicting. The problem with this is more in the nature of the information and its source. Even though humans are quite varied, individually, in their sophistication and knowledge base, if they are in divine alignment and acting through their heart a significant amount of the time, they will have useful things to say and will be more an asset than a liability because they will be acting through truth, a sense of morality, and fair play. While AI systems can learn about such standards and expectations, the key in understanding where the limits lie is to consider the very definition of AI. In a sense, it is truly artificial. It is a mimic of reality and not a substitute for what is truly divine, through not having a soul connection to begin with.