497 views0 answers0 votes
532 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders: Our current Lightworker Healing Protocol reads, “Source Creator, invite the higher self of my clients to assist Creator in doing a Quantum Healing to bring in new instructions for the cells of the body from a future time of youthful health and wellbeing, apply it to all parallel past, current, and future lives and their future extensions, keeping it going with momentum, as a new reservoir of healing instructions that is available on an ongoing basis and redelivered in any new window of opportunity.” Should a clear distinction be made between the terms current and present? As in “the current life” (i.e. the one we are experiencing here and now) and “parallel present lives (more than one ongoing incarnation of our soul extension at the present time perhaps?)?” If so, should the wording above be changed to “apply it throughout the current life and all parallel past, present, and future lives and their future extensions?”541 views0 answers0 votes
624 views0 answers0 votes
442 views0 answers0 votes
661 views0 answers0 votes
567 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks about the Lightworker Healing Protocol: “Is it of value when asking for “release of all vows, oaths, contracts, agreements, allegiances, and promises made between my clients and any spirit attachment, dark spirit, alien, extragalactic, or interdimensional intruders and other attacking entities, alternate realities, and dimensions they have encountered” to also include THEMSELVES in the list of potential attackers?”560 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner wonders about asking in the Lightworker Healing Protocol for removal of all sources of negativity from food and beverages…but why not water, air, medications, toiletries such as makeup, toothpaste and mouthwash, alcohol, marijuana, and other recreational drugs? Would it be best, instead of “food and beverages” for all the above, to say “removal of all sources of negativity from anything inhaled, ingested, or absorbed by the body?”643 views0 answers0 votes
463 views0 answers0 votes
626 views0 answers0 votes
555 views0 answers0 votes
556 views0 answers0 votes
I think I’m starting to understand the issues about going into the past and changing something and how it may not impact the future already created. Is it correct to say that if events have taken place involving me and then I go back in time and do something to cause the death of my younger self, perhaps at a very young age so that nothing in that timeline would seem to have happened from my perspective in pondering the consequences, that would clearly not be the reality? What you’ve been teaching is that by virtue of the fact I reached that child self’s future and then was able to come back, all of the consequences of my earlier days were, therefore, already created. So, in effect, if I were to go back in time and kill myself as an infant, for example, that would seem to leave a hole in that infant’s potential future. But, in actuality, there was a future already in existence from that infant growing up to become myself in that future time when I commenced to travel back and cause harm to my infant self. Am I on the right track here to understand why things will not unravel when changes to events in the past are done through time travel?579 views0 answers0 votes
908 views0 answers0 votes