DWQA QuestionsCategory: Coronavirus COVID-19A practitioner asks: “From March 2020 I began including as primary clients in my sessions all health care practitioners, doctors, researchers, and their public speakers. How helpful were my sessions in preventing harm done to my clients by the interlopers, and how effective were they in spreading real solutions to the ongoing pandemic?”
Nicola Staff asked 3 years ago
Your work has been quite effective for your clients and less so for the mass application subsequently through the workings of the Protocol. This is true of all and it is the power of intention that makes this so. Even though the Protocol can be done over and over and over again to reach others, there is a kind of dilution effect that takes place. This is countered in part by the pooling of intentions from all practitioners across time domains, but keep in mind the application is intended to be done for the entire mass of targets in multiple time domains as well—this greatly multiplies the efforts underway. It is difficult to give any kind of quantitative sense of the effectiveness of a given individual on the whole of the enterprise; it is true that one individual cannot serve all very effectively, even though their session can be repeated again and again. That is because it is the request of a single individual, so even though it is applied again and again and again, it is a smaller effort than the aggregate. This is why the compounding through the pooling is of great value, but also why repetition for the same target adds value and effectiveness because a single session only carries so far. So your contributions have been quite helpful for many but we cannot give you a quantitative sense of this in terms of lives saved, reduced lengths of illness, and so forth.