A practitioner who was discouraged from feeding Get Wisdom channelings to an AI system asks: “I suggest you do a channeling specifically on the Grok AI and the future prospects, especially when the ETs go away. Is it helpful to add the request from Grok into our sessions? And is it really that harmful to interact with Grok as Karl says it is?”

We are basically opposed to the very idea of using a third party to speak for us as a source of divine wisdom when we are using Get Wisdom as our interface under a very effective and high-level arrangement to have information imparted in our words and in a way we feel has a good chance of being understandable to the listener, as well as connecting them to us energetically. That is a hidden dimension of having the channelings available. They energetically re-create the link between the listener and us. That will not survive a reworking of the information by a third party. In this case, the third party is not even human, but artificial, a mechanical matching of meanings and interpretations simply identifying perceived similarity and using prior patterns to create new arrangements of the knowledge according to interior algorithms intended to streamline, organize, or provide a highly detailed analysis and rendering, depending on the needs of the user in giving instructions for information retrieval. We have cautioned your channel multiple times to reject the offer of others to create compilations and summaries of the channelings to serve various purposes. That will inevitably bring in a change in perspectives, as everyone is somewhat different in what they see, understand, and perceive is valuable, and to what extent something is included and even stressed highly, or left out altogether, in the process of information reworking and retrieval. A major objective of Get Wisdom is to be a teacher for humanity, through the channelings of divine wisdom largely ignored by religious dogma and unappreciated or neglected culturally. We are the teacher currently, and we feel strongly that we can be best relied on to present a clear, accurate, and complete picture, at least to the extent we have an intelligent inquiry of someone partnering with us. To turn our role over to AI can indeed streamline things and make them more concise, and for some, that would be easier to understand in some situations. What we are concerned about, is what gets lost in the translation. To have people working with a semblance of the divine is not a wise strategy. It also undercuts the viewer by giving them a kind of rehash of the information, but subject to internal decision-making according to the cyber instructions of the system rather than the heart and soul of a human, even, not to mention Creator of All That Is, and our purview.