Do the scientific arguments, and seismic, physical, and photographic records of the 9/11 destruction of the World Trade Center towers recounted in the book by Judy Wood, Where Did the Towers Go? provide an accurate and convincing refutation of the official account of what actually happened?

This is very much the case, as you saw for yourself in reading the book with an open mind. It explains quite clearly, with logic and precision, how the seismic data show that the magnitude of the collapse of each tower registered far less force than should have been the case with the tremendous weight of concrete the buildings represented. And that fits perfectly with the physical observation that the buildings largely were pulverized in midair and much of the material floated to the ground or floated away, much of which became airborne for weeks and weeks over New York City as a haze that took that long to dissipate. The many strange occurrences, the odd fires at great distance from the towers themselves, the slow but relentless destruction of the surrounding buildings over the course of that day, are not explained simply by the collapse of the towers themselves, which largely fell on top of their footprint, and what was flung to the sides was too small a mass of material to even be consistent with the mass of the buildings to begin with. All of this was simply ignored by the media and by the officials brought in to analyze what had happened. Mind control subjugation was highly effective to prevent serious study, analysis, and public discussion of the many curiosities that have no ready explanation, based solely on the narrative of a plane hitting each of the towers to cause such damage over such a wide area. The cover story persists to this day. Your inability to get others in your acquaintance to even look at the book shows quite vividly that there is a built-in aversion to the subject entirely, so it is a secret that keeps itself with the outside help.