DWQA QuestionsCategory: Channeling PitfallsRemote viewing has been employed to guide investment in cryptocurrencies, despite a described common difficulty in predicting financial outcomes to benefit people personally. What is Creator’s Perspective?
Nicola Staff asked 1 year ago
The first problem we see with the use of psychic probing becoming involved with investment in cryptocurrencies is that that entire enterprise is nondivine. People can use their intuition for whatever they like. It is a gift from us as part of the human makeup, to the extent it has not already been snuffed out or diminished too greatly to be of much use. And the latter is what most people would say, in not recognizing their own psychic abilities as being prominent and of practical value, because what they experience personally will be very catch-as-catch-can, something noticed after the fact and not amenable to making predictions one might bet money on. The problem with cryptocurrencies is that this is an extraterrestrial concoction that is a kind of Ponzi scheme. So early investors in such things can ride the gravy train as long as the interest grows, and that is what has been happening since the advent of the first cryptocurrency, others have come along and been launched to great fanfare and growing amazement and excitement by naïve investors enamored of the next big thing, and all too likely to jump aboard with both feet without looking first. This is what happens with many things that become a kind of mania and there have been many examples throughout history of this. There is a flurry of excitement, a surge of interest, and widespread adoption, but once everyone has made their investment and there is no new money that can be put into the sector, there will be a top formed and, with no new surge in valuation, people may begin to have doubts and any trades will likely be withdrawals rather than new investment. The price will start to decline and, as it goes lower, may well trigger a selling panic at some point and such a plunge will dishearten more and more true believers who will jump ship—getting out along the way might prove to be prudent. This is not to say that all such investments will have a very simple trajectory that is predictable. Many people will see a dip in price as a buying opportunity. That can revivify a flagging investment and create a new surge to even reach a new high level before a repeat retracement happens, so such manias can get going and keep going for a long period of time, but eventually something will happen, if only something new and shiny of greater lure, and people will get tired of the eventual plateau. There might also be a coming to the senses that undercuts support on a widespread level. This is what we see will happen with cryptocurrencies because they are more wishful thinking than substance. The underlying technology has many uses, but to declare something as having value simply because it is unique and has a high-tech character is still an emperor with no clothes. It is only if others agree that it is valuable that will make it so, and that is a precarious perch and history will show this—many will lose fortunes before this is a footnote of history.