Was use of the term “progressive” instead of “liberal,” promoted through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance as a form of propaganda to make people believe that change represents desirable progress, always, when such is not the case? Doesn’t this condition us to overturn the past, even to abandon things that work?

This is a perfect example, in fact, of mind control manipulation changing not only the language and its interpretation but established practice and cultural norms, by conditioning people to change direction to even become a movement and a justification for a departure from well-established tradition, moving away from things that are time-honored, but work. And that is the reason they are the norm. It is an obvious question to ask, "What will we gain and what will we lose?" through such a redefining of things and a change in goals and objectives, to move away from past practice aggressively and embrace a new perspective and approach that has been heretofore unproven. A normal, well-balanced, person would be reluctant to take such a plunge but not someone who is manipulated through mind control with careful, relentless, propaganda campaigns given subliminally, nowadays 24/7, through all the screens people watch so frequently. They will be bombarded with manipulations to move in particular directions and sometimes in opposing ways, which will be embraced by different factions because of their constitution and individual soul attribute expressions; for example, to be more liberal or more conservative. Changes in the culture and the language itself are a natural evolution of learning and growth. But the idea of change carries inherent risk because one is stepping into the unknown if only in a small way, and that is always a departure from safety. It is those things that are well-tried, well-established, and time-honored that can be relied on to be safe ground and a productive choice that will lead to at least a continuation of the status quo. And, often, that is not a bad thing if people are living and thriving and surviving adequately with current practices. When people become disgruntled and begin to disrupt the established order through a political movement, in particular, you can be sure there will be attempts to manipulate it or even to have caused it in the first place. Human society is always struggling and this is because it is always under subjugation and suppression by the interlopers to inhibit what is a normal way of thinking and feeling for human beings still with some spiritual connection. Those who have become corrupted are more easily manipulated to become radicalized because they lack that tether, that link to a higher awareness and a higher reality and higher standards that it represents. It is a loss, personally and collectively, when people drift away from a belief in the divine and an appreciation of divine principles for their conduct and the accepted traditions and rules of engagement with others, as codified through the laws of the land. Things will only bend so far before they break, and that is a favorite game being played on you: "How far can we make them bend?" They know if something breaks it will cause damage and this is what the interlopers most enjoy. Can they make you trip and fall? Can they make you falter? Or flounder even, having left the safe harbor and now are cast into the water, perhaps in a raging storm and only able to survive by your wits? There are many disruptions that are engineered. This is routine. You have discussed this in your livestream program, how the commercial sector is manipulated to constantly seek something new and different whether it is needed or not. That is quite telling. The fact that one must always have a new model of everything can be seen through simple logic that if the original product was a carefully designed attempt at perfection to fill a particular need, that making a change unless there is a new insight and a true further innovation to make an enhancement, it will risk drifting away from even a high level of functioning if such was achieved initially. This happens with important matters like the design of vehicles which are extremely costly and very much needed by most people for day-to-day living and without it, things will fall apart. They need their car to get to work, to take the kids to school and bring them home again, take them to lessons, on and on it goes. Being able to obtain food and household articles when needed urgently, especially, will require a trip to the store which, these days, will likely be beyond walking distance for most people. So to compromise the tried-and-true brings with it not only greater variability in quality and performance and therefore effectiveness on an economic basis, it will also introduce greater uncertainty as well as inefficiency. If things break down because they are a lesser grade in quality, or less hardy materials used in their makeup, this creates not only inconvenience but an economic loss through wasted time if not requiring costly replacement. Many times, people live with a lesser standard because things have actually moved backward with regard to functional lifespan and performance in things like appliances, tools, and products of all kinds. The trend in food has ended up in the current sorry state of being highly artificial and even dangerous because it is increasingly an assortment of chemicals to hold everything together, give it an appealing color, perhaps a fragrance or taste enhancement, with additives to stabilize the combination of ingredients to avoid changes in texture or appearance on storage, and to include preservatives to slow degradation over time that might otherwise occur, but without consideration of potential harm it might cause to introduce so many foreign substances into the diet. The biggest pollution is not in the foods you eat but in the ideas you are exposed to on the screens you watch, relentlessly. It starts from birth with what people around the infant do and say because they are programmed by their devices in how they think. The world is unwinding at the same time it is following a progressive agenda, because every new thing creates problems that are inherent to the changes the new approach represents. This is a huge corruption in politics, and deliberately so, always to move people away from the ways of the past, not to make things better but to actually destabilize things to keep people off balance and thus more willing to accept things changing because they are new. This is inevitable, in fact, with so many things being phased out that are old standbys. The end result is a degradation, not a true progression but a regression that is insidious and ever-increasing, and ever-encroaching on the quality of life as a deliberate intrusion in your world.