The addition of the term "creeds" adds additional specificity, but it is not strictly necessary. The wording of the protocol is never comprehensive but consists of a series of examples. Judging where the dividing line might be, in terms of whether something is included or not in some cases, is more difficult than others. The creeds people acquire, for example, through religious observance, are a kind of allegiance to the ideas and principles they describe. The way these are enacted and influence the individual and those they interact with is accomplished through the intent of their consciousness, and in some cases the subconscious levels of the mind, and give rise to cordings. And the latter is the mechanistic basis for the entanglement and long-term consequences of having such thinking and involvement with faulty ideas and objectives. You can be sure that the consequences of distorted views and corrupt ideas constituting a religious creed, or body of beliefs espoused by a group or organization, will create many phenomena addressable by the protocol directly. What you call it is not so very important, but you can trust that negativity will be dealt with regardless of the cause.
Please login or Register to submit your answer