A practitioner asks: “Would it be prudent for there to be a version of the LHP that only a few select people among the practitioner community are privy to, based on leadership role and dedication to the cause? I am asking this for two reasons: 1) security and 2) the recent blackout forecasting experience has demonstrated that some practitioners are of questionable faith and understanding, and might not be steadfast to the project long-term. Would keeping more exotic maneuverers away from all eyes be prudent and more effective for the greater good? Could this “limited” version be merged with the rest of the practitioner prayer pool by divine realm, so that other practitioners fuel the exotic maneuvers but without directly knowing about them? I’m thinking it would be sort of like when we harness all future protocol updates in the present, and send current updates into the past. Or does every part of the LHP have to be requested by all practitioners with full understanding of all tactics, in order for all requests to be effective and the protocol itself to work properly?”

We will answer the latter part of your question first. It is not essential for all to have an excellent and complete working knowledge of each and every component to an equivalent extent. Variances are, in fact, unavoidable as people vary in their intelligence, savvy, and willingness to apply themselves to even learning the protocol with depth and passion. The consequence will be that sessions done by some will be less fully efficient with respect to their personal energy. But there will, nonetheless, be a pooling of all intentions from all practitioners and that will be a useful backstop to keep anyone from doing grossly substandard work, unless they are so poorly connected to the process with preparation and performance during their session that it is simply not enough in divine alignment to allow things to proceed. That will be rare and not the case for those people you see as somewhat misguided. As for creating a more elite version of the protocol, we do not think this is in the best interest of the enterprise. After all, it is the collective effort that is making things happen, not a small portion of a small group to begin with, who have rarefied abilities and awareness and thus keener appreciation and understanding of the nuances and can be trusted completely to do the right thing and be the best example and influence for others. You cannot achieve perfection from any group effort. There will always be those who lack, those who corrupt, those who disappoint, those who underperform, and those who are simply in poor understanding but might be quite vocal and certain of their point of view and may even bully others in promoting their misguided notions. This just reflects the fact that the world is a difficult and challenging place, and will be so on a local, small, scale as well as large. So all involved must keep their wits about them and focus on the big picture and rely on the group as a whole and its primary leader, to set the tone and be an authority to process concerns and questions by anyone uncomfortable with things that are going on. So what is being proposed is to take a difference of opinion that is disquieting, with the end result being a fractionation of the group as a whole into two portions. We see that as a weakening more than a strengthening. And where would that end? What would happen if someone accepted into that elite inner circle proves disappointing and there needs to be another fragmentation to isolate them from being an influence on the top-tier or presumed top-tier members? This would be a further diminishment. Keep in mind, that it is the aggregate effort that powers the healing, so one corrupted or inadequate voice will have little impact and is not to be feared. We will always follow truth. That which is faulty, misguided, incomplete, or frankly corrupted through bad intentions, will be ignored as being non-divine and will not affect the whole. So there is no need for worry here.